Cipolletta Sabrina, Tedoldi Ilaria, Tomaino Silvia Caterina Maria
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1497544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497544. eCollection 2024.
Loneliness is a prevalent issue among international university students, often exacerbated by cultural and linguistic barriers. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact of a blended intervention to promote international students' social connectedness and well-being.
A sample of 49 international students from the University of Padua (Italy) was recruited. The study followed the methodology of a non-randomized controlled trial comparing a blended intervention (comprising group activities and online self-help materials) with two other active conditions (self-help only and peer-to-peer interventions) and a control condition at two times (baseline and at 8 weeks). Participants completed a survey to assess their satisfaction with the interventions, changes in their interactions and wellbeing. They also filled in some questionnaires to measure anxiety, depression, perceived social support, loneliness and satisfaction with life. A mixed-method analysis was conducted.
Results showed that interventions involving in-person activities had significant advantages over self-help intervention in terms of interaction improvement and a higher number of relationships. Participants perceived self-help materials as more relevant, satisfactory, and functional within the blended group compared to the self-help group. Contrary to the control group, the blended and peer-to-peer groups reported lower scores on the standardized measures of loneliness, anxiety, and depression, and higher scores on satisfaction with life, collected pre- and post-intervention. The thematic analysis of the answers to the open-ended questions showed that in-person group activities provided the opportunity to compare themselves with peers and have a direct experience of new social connections.
The findings highlight the importance of translating insights from self-help materials into active and direct social experiences, to reduce loneliness through the emergence of new perspectives and shared meaning making.
孤独是国际大学生中普遍存在的问题,文化和语言障碍往往会加剧这一问题。这项试点研究旨在评估一种混合干预措施在促进国际学生社会联系和幸福感方面的可行性、可接受性及影响。
招募了49名来自意大利帕多瓦大学的国际学生作为样本。该研究采用非随机对照试验方法,将一种混合干预措施(包括小组活动和在线自助材料)与另外两种积极干预措施(仅自助和同伴互助干预)以及一个对照条件在两个时间点(基线和8周时)进行比较。参与者完成了一项调查,以评估他们对干预措施的满意度、互动变化和幸福感。他们还填写了一些问卷来测量焦虑、抑郁、感知到的社会支持、孤独感和生活满意度。进行了混合方法分析。
结果表明,涉及面对面活动的干预措施在改善互动和增加人际关系数量方面比自助干预具有显著优势。与自助组相比,参与者认为混合组中的自助材料更相关、更令人满意且更实用。与对照组相反,混合组和同伴互助组在干预前后收集的孤独感、焦虑和抑郁标准化测量中的得分较低,而生活满意度得分较高。对开放式问题答案的主题分析表明,面对面小组活动提供了与同龄人比较并直接体验新社会联系的机会。
研究结果强调了将自助材料中的见解转化为积极直接的社会体验的重要性,通过新视角的出现和共同意义的构建来减少孤独感。