Patnana Arun Kumar, Jayam Cheranjeevi, Kumar Neeraj, Narain Satya, Galani Mohit, Kumar Pravin
Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;17(9):1071-1074. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2940.
The term "spin" in biomedical journals refers to reporting strategies that misinterpret actual results and mislead readers toward viewing a drug or treatment in a more favorable or less favorable manner. The study aimed to evaluate the presence of spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals.
The study was conducted in the Department of Dentistry at a tertiary care hospital from April to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials published in PubMed-indexed pediatric dentistry journals from January 2010 to December 2022 were included. A literature search was performed by two independent reviewers according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The abstracts of the included articles were evaluated to identify spin. The method described by Boutron et al. was followed to define and identify spin. Data summary statistics of the included studies were calculated using Google Sheets.
The initial search in PubMed resulted in 3,566 articles. According to the eligibility criteria, 327 articles were included and analyzed for spin in the abstracts. A total of 10 out of 327 (3%) articles showed spin in the abstracts. Randomized controlled trials evaluating pulpotomy as an intervention exhibited the most spin. The majority of abstracts with spin showed a discrepancy in the presentation of results and the conclusion section.
The presence of spin is evident in 3% of PubMed-indexed Pediatric Dentistry journals published from 2010 to 2022.
Clinicians should be careful when implying the observations of abstracts of RCTs to the clinical scenario, considering the presence of spin.
Patnana AK, Jayam C, Kumar N, Evaluation of Spin in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Pediatric Dentistry Journals. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(9):1071-1074.
生物医学期刊中的“倾向性报道”一词是指那些错误解读实际研究结果,并以更有利或更不利的方式误导读者看待某种药物或治疗方法的报道策略。本研究旨在评估发表于被PubMed收录的儿科牙科学期刊上的随机对照试验(RCT)摘要中是否存在倾向性报道。
本研究于2023年4月至6月在一家三级护理医院的牙科进行。纳入2010年1月至2022年12月发表于被PubMed收录的儿科牙科学期刊上的随机对照试验。由两名独立评审员根据预先设定的纳入和排除标准进行文献检索。对纳入文章的摘要进行评估以识别倾向性报道。采用布特龙等人描述的方法来定义和识别倾向性报道。使用谷歌表格计算纳入研究的数据汇总统计量。
在PubMed中的初步检索得到3566篇文章。根据纳入标准,327篇文章被纳入并分析其摘要中的倾向性报道。327篇文章中有10篇(3%)的摘要存在倾向性报道。评估牙髓切断术作为干预措施的随机对照试验表现出最多的倾向性报道。大多数存在倾向性报道的摘要在结果呈现和结论部分存在差异。
在2010年至2022年发表于被PubMed收录的儿科牙科学期刊中,3%的文章存在倾向性报道。
考虑到存在倾向性报道,临床医生在将RCT摘要中的观察结果应用于临床情况时应谨慎。
帕特纳纳·AK、贾亚姆·C、库马尔·N,《儿科牙科学期刊发表的随机对照试验摘要中的倾向性报道评估》。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(9):1071 - 1074。