• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma-A critical review.肝细胞癌的医疗质量——一项批判性综述
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Dec 11;9(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000595. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
2
[(How) Are quality indicators for measuring and appraising the quality of healthcare derived from evidence-based clinical practice guidelines? A review].[(如何)从循证临床实践指南中得出用于衡量和评估医疗质量的质量指标?一项综述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
3
Quality of Cancer Care in Patients with Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝硬化和肝细胞癌患者的癌症护理质量
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Sep;17(9):34. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0459-8.
4
Quality of care for gout in the US needs improvement.美国痛风的护理质量有待提高。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):822-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22767.
5
Quality indicators for home- and community-based aged care: A critical literature review to inform policy directions.居家和社区养老服务质量指标:为制定政策方向提供重要文献综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):383-395. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13103. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
6
Monitoring quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma: A modified Delphi consensus.监测肝细胞癌的护理质量:一项改良 Delphi 共识。
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Nov;6(11):3260-3271. doi: 10.1002/hep4.2089. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
7
Quality indicators for cervical cancer care in Japan.日本宫颈癌护理质量指标。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Nov;29(6):e83. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e83.
8
[Development of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors from the perspective of S3-guideline authors].[基于指南的质量指标的制定:从S3指南作者角度对障碍和促进因素的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
[Methodological Standard for the Development of Quality Indicators within Clinical Practice Guidelines - Results of a structured consensus process].[临床实践指南中质量指标制定的方法标准——结构化共识过程的结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Feb;160:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
10
Clinical Practice Guidelines For the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.肝细胞癌管理临床实践指南:系统评价。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Mar;55(1):318-331. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00961-0. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Modern approach to hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.肝细胞癌治疗的现代方法。
World J Hepatol. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):107873. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107873.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-World Data on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific: The INSIGHT Study.亚太地区肝细胞癌诊断、治疗与管理的真实世界数据:洞察研究
Liver Cancer. 2023 Oct 9;13(3):298-313. doi: 10.1159/000534513. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Improved Survival Outcomes with Surgical Resection Compared to Ablative Therapy in Early-Stage HCC: A Large, Real-World, Propensity-Matched, Multi-Centre, Australian Cohort Study.与早期肝癌消融治疗相比,手术切除可改善生存结局:一项大型、真实世界、倾向评分匹配、多中心的澳大利亚队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;15(24):5741. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245741.
3
The impact of waiting time and delayed treatment on the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.等待时间和延迟治疗对肝细胞癌患者预后的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024 Feb 29;28(1):1-13. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.23-090. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Registry-derived stage (RD-Stage) for capturing cancer stage at diagnosis for endometrial cancer.用于捕获子宫内膜癌诊断时癌症分期的基于登记的分期(RD-Stage)。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11615-6.
5
Disparities in outcomes and access to therapy options in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌在治疗效果和治疗选择可及性方面的差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Feb 8;116(2):264-274. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad213.
6
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in Australia: current and future perspectives.澳大利亚肝细胞癌监测:现状与未来展望。
Med J Aust. 2023 Nov 6;219(9):432-438. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52124. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
7
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on acute-on-chronic liver failure.欧洲肝脏研究学会急性肝衰竭临床实践指南。
J Hepatol. 2023 Aug;79(2):461-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
8
AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.美国肝病研究学会肝细胞癌预防、诊断和治疗实践指南。
Hepatology. 2023 Dec 1;78(6):1922-1965. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466. Epub 2023 May 22.
9
Multidisciplinary care for patients with HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多学科治疗肝细胞癌患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatol Commun. 2023 Apr 26;7(5). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000143. eCollection 2023 May 1.
10
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2021 version (5th JSH-HCC Guidelines).肝细胞癌临床实践指南:日本肝脏学会2021版(第5版JSH-HCC指南)
Hepatol Res. 2023 May;53(5):383-390. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13892. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

肝细胞癌的医疗质量——一项批判性综述

Quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma-A critical review.

作者信息

Abdelmalak Jonathan, Lubel John S, Sinclair Marie, Majeed Ammar, Kemp William, Roberts Stuart K

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Hepatol Commun. 2024 Dec 11;9(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000595. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000595
PMID:39665645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11637749/
Abstract

There is significant variation in HCC management across different centers with poor adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as assessed in prior studies. In Australia, quality indicators (QIs) have recently been proposed by a multidisciplinary group of experts to help provide a framework to assess and monitor the quality of HCC care. In this review, we discuss the many areas where real-world practice deviates from evidence-based medicine, the role that QI sets play in addressing this gap, and the similarities and differences between Australian QIs and other leading treatment guidelines and QI sets from around the world. We focus on the utility of QI sets to identify opportunities for targeted improvement in the real-world clinical environment. We conclude with a discussion about the formation of a national clinical quality registry as a long-term measure to facilitate continual improvements in patient care within and across sites in order to optimize patient outcomes.

摘要

正如先前研究所评估的那样,不同中心在肝癌管理方面存在显著差异,对循证临床实践指南的遵循情况较差。在澳大利亚,一个多学科专家小组最近提出了质量指标(QIs),以帮助提供一个评估和监测肝癌护理质量的框架。在本综述中,我们讨论了实际临床实践与循证医学背离的诸多领域、质量指标集在弥合这一差距中所起的作用,以及澳大利亚质量指标与其他主要治疗指南及世界各地质量指标集之间的异同。我们重点关注质量指标集在现实临床环境中识别有针对性改进机会的效用。最后,我们讨论了建立一个国家临床质量登记处的问题,作为一项长期措施,以促进各医疗机构内部及之间持续改善患者护理,从而优化患者治疗效果。