Abdelmalak Jonathan, Strasser Simone I, Ngu Natalie, Dennis Claude, Sinclair Marie, Majumdar Avik, Collins Kate, Bateman Katherine, Dev Anouk, Abasszade Joshua H, Valaydon Zina, Saitta Daniel, Gazelakis Kathryn, Byers Susan, Holmes Jacinta, Thompson Alexander J, Pandiaraja Dhivya, Bollipo Steven, Sharma Suresh, Joseph Merlyn, Nicoll Amanda, Batt Nicholas, Sawhney Rohit, Tang Myo J, Lubel John, Riordan Stephen, Hannah Nicholas, Haridy James, Sood Siddharth, Lam Eileen, Greenhill Elysia, Majeed Ammar, Kemp William, Zalcberg John, Roberts Stuart K
Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;15(24):5741. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245741.
The optimal treatment approach in very-early and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not precisely defined, and there is ambiguity in the literature around the comparative efficacy of surgical resection versus ablation as curative therapies for limited disease. We performed this real-world propensity-matched, multi-centre cohort study to assess for differences in survival outcomes between those undergoing resection and those receiving ablation. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020 who received ablation or resection as initial treatment were included in the study. A total of 450 patients were included in the study from 10 major liver centres including two transplant centres. Following propensity score matching using key covariates, 156 patients were available for analysis with 78 in each group. Patients who underwent resection had significantly improved overall survival (log-rank test = 0.023) and local recurrence-free survival (log rank test = 0.027) compared to those who received ablation. Based on real-world data, our study supports the use of surgical resection in preference to ablation as first-line curative therapy in appropriately selected BCLC 0/A HCC patients.
极早期和早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的最佳治疗方法尚未明确界定,而且文献中对于手术切除与消融作为局限性疾病的根治性疗法的比较疗效存在模糊之处。我们开展了这项真实世界倾向匹配多中心队列研究,以评估接受切除术和接受消融术的患者在生存结局方面的差异。研究纳入了2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间首次诊断为巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)0/A期HCC且接受消融或切除作为初始治疗的患者。该研究共纳入了来自10个主要肝脏中心(包括两个移植中心)的450例患者。在使用关键协变量进行倾向评分匹配后,有156例患者可供分析,每组各78例。与接受消融术的患者相比,接受切除术的患者的总生存期(对数秩检验 = 0.023)和局部无复发生存期(对数秩检验 = 0.027)均有显著改善。基于真实世界数据,我们的研究支持在适当选择的BCLC 0/A期HCC患者中,优先使用手术切除而非消融作为一线根治性疗法。