Suppr超能文献

完全性肝尾状叶切除术:机器人手术方式安全吗?来自经验丰富中心的报告。

Complete hepatic caudate lobe resection: is robotic approach safe? Report from experienced centers.

作者信息

Donisi Greta, Doria Emanuele, Bosch Gemma, Burdio Fernando, De Meyere Celine, D'Hondt Mathieu, Di Benedetto Fabrizio, Filippo Rosalinda, Libia Annarita, Lopez-Lopez Victor, Magistri Paolo, Memeo Riccardo, Sanchez-Velazquez Patricia, Spampinato Marcello Giuseppe, Robles-Campos Ricardo, Sucandy Iswanto, Ielpo Benedetto

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.

Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 12;19(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02162-8.

Abstract

Minimally invasive liver surgery has become widely accepted as a safe and effective approach, especially with experienced surgeons. Robotic hepatectomy may offer significant benefits in challenging procedures like caudate lobe resection. The caudate lobe's intricate anatomy and deep-seated location make its resection particularly challenging, with limited reports on minimally invasive techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of robotic isolated complete caudectomy and to provide a detailed description of the different technical approaches available. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted across eight experienced hepatobiliary robotic surgery centers between June 2020 and March 2024. All patients who underwent elective RICC during this period were included. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, focusing on demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative outcomes, and histopathological results. The primary outcome was the feasibility and safety of the robotic approach. The study included 42 patients. The median (IQR) operative time was 180 (125-245) min, with a median estimated blood loss of 30 (0-100) ml. There were no conversions to open surgery and only one severe complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred. No postoperative mortality was observed, and all resections for malignant lesions achieved R0 margins. The median time to flatus was 1 (1-1) day, time to solid diet was 1 (1-2) days, and the median length of stay was 3 (2-4) days. RICC is a feasible and safe procedure, demonstrating significant benefits in operative efficiency and patient recovery. However, further research with larger, prospective multicenter studies is necessary to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

摘要

微创肝脏手术已被广泛认为是一种安全有效的方法,尤其是在经验丰富的外科医生手中。机器人肝切除术在诸如尾状叶切除等具有挑战性的手术中可能具有显著优势。尾状叶复杂的解剖结构和深部位置使其切除极具挑战性,关于微创技术的报道有限。本研究的目的是评估机器人孤立性完全尾状叶切除术的可行性和安全性,并详细描述可用的不同技术方法。这项回顾性多中心研究于2020年6月至2024年3月在八个经验丰富的肝胆机器人手术中心进行。纳入在此期间接受择期机器人孤立性完全尾状叶切除术的所有患者。前瞻性收集数据并进行回顾性分析,重点关注人口统计学、术中变量、术后结果和组织病理学结果。主要结局是机器人手术方法的可行性和安全性。该研究纳入了42例患者。中位(四分位间距)手术时间为180(125 - 245)分钟,中位估计失血量为30(0 - 100)毫升。没有转为开放手术的情况,仅发生了1例严重并发症(Clavien - Dindo≥3级)。未观察到术后死亡,所有恶性病变切除术均达到R0切缘。排气中位时间为1(1 - 1)天,开始固体饮食时间为1(1 - 2)天,中位住院时间为3(2 - 4)天。机器人孤立性完全尾状叶切除术是一种可行且安全的手术,在手术效率和患者恢复方面显示出显著优势。然而,需要进行更大规模的前瞻性多中心研究以进一步证实这些发现并评估长期结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验