Carlson Matthew L, Daher Ghazal S, Khandalavala Karl R, Lohse Christine M, Neff Brian A, Driscoll Colin L W, Peris-Celda Maria, Van Gompel Jamie J, Link Michael J, Saoji Aniket A
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Otol Neurotol. 2025 Jan 1;46(1):60-66. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004379.
To compare the utility of intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex testing (eSRT) for cochlear nerve integrity monitoring during simultaneous translabyrinthine resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) and cochlear implantation.
Historical cohort study.
Tertiary academic referral center.
Eleven patients (12 cases) who underwent translabyrinthine tumor resection with simultaneous placement of a standard, unmodified cochlear implant (CI).
A CI placed at the beginning of the operation before tumor resection to facilitate intraoperative cochlear nerve monitoring through a CI-delivered electrical stimulus.
Correlation of intraoperative monitoring outcomes with postoperative CI performance.
Among the 12 cases (median age, 47 years), eABR waveforms were present at the conclusion of tumor resection in 10, including 6 that achieved open set speech perception. Of the 2 cases with negative eABR, 1 achieved open set speech perception. By contrast, of the 8 cases with a positive eSRT response, 7 achieved open set speech perception. Of the 4 cases with a negative eSRT response, none achieved open set speech perception. The 3 cases that did not receive auditory stimulation included 2 with positive and 1 with negative eABR; all 3 had a negative eSRT response.
Intraoperative eSRT using an unmodified CI is a promising new method for monitoring the integrity of the cochlear nerve during simultaneous VS resection. eSRT response at the conclusion of tumor resection strongly correlated with CI open set speech capacity. Although still useful, eABR was less reliable at predicting postoperative hearing outcomes in this series.
比较术中电诱发听性脑干反应(eABR)和电诱发镫骨肌反射测试(eSRT)在前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)经迷路切除术与人工耳蜗植入术中监测蜗神经完整性的效用。
回顾性队列研究。
三级学术转诊中心。
11例患者(12例手术)接受了经迷路肿瘤切除术并同期植入标准、未改良的人工耳蜗(CI)。
在肿瘤切除术前于手术开始时植入CI,以便通过CI传递的电刺激在术中监测蜗神经。
术中监测结果与术后CI性能的相关性。
在这12例患者(中位年龄47岁)中,10例在肿瘤切除结束时出现eABR波形,其中6例达到开放言语识别。2例eABR阴性的患者中,1例达到开放言语识别。相比之下,8例eSRT反应阳性的患者中,7例达到开放言语识别。4例eSRT反应阴性的患者均未达到开放言语识别。3例未接受听觉刺激的患者中,2例eABR阳性,1例eABR阴性;3例eSRT反应均为阴性。
使用未改良CI进行术中eSRT是在VS同期切除术中监测蜗神经完整性的一种有前景的新方法。肿瘤切除结束时的eSRT反应与CI开放言语能力密切相关。虽然eABR仍有作用,但在本系列中预测术后听力结果的可靠性较低。