Suppr超能文献

在半月板后根部撕裂修复中,与传统缝线相比,缝线带显示出更好的生物力学性能和更大程度的半月板愈合:一项系统评价。

Suture tapes show superior biomechanical properties and greater meniscal healing compared to conventional sutures in posterior meniscal root tear repairs: A systematic review.

作者信息

Boksh Khalis, Shepherd Duncan E T, Espino Daniel M, Ghosh Arijit, Boutefnouchet Tarek, Aujla Randeep

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Leicester Academic Knee Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Dec 12. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12554.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to perform a systematic review to determine whether ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tapes have superior biomechanical properties compared to conventional sutures in posterior meniscal root tear (PMRT) repairs, and whether this translates into superior clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed and Embase were used to perform a systematic review using the following search terms: (meniscus OR meniscal) AND (root OR posterior horn) AND (suture OR tape OR wire OR cord). Data pertaining to certain biomechanical properties (load to failure, stiffness, displacement during cyclical loading and at failure), meniscal healing and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were extracted.

RESULTS

Seven biomechanical and two clinical studies were included. There were 232 knees for biomechanical testing: 81 with UHMWPE tapes and 151 with conventional sutures (133 with UHMWPE sutures and 18 with Ethibond [Ethicon]). Testing set-up was similar across studies, but there were differences in repair techniques, including suture configuration, location and method of fixation. In general, the consensus was that tapes had a higher load to failure and stiffness, with similar displacement at failure to that of UHMWPE sutures. A similar trend was also observed when tapes were compared to Ethibond, except for FiberTape (Arthrex). This particular UHMWPE tape showed greater displacement during cyclical loading, resulting from knot slippage. Clinically, there were 73 patients, 41 with UHMWPE tapes and 32 with either UHMWPE sutures (n = 18) or braided polyester sutures (n = 14). Tapes led to greater meniscal healing 1 year postoperatively, with PROMs similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

UHMWPE tapes generally demonstrated superior biomechanical properties compared to conventional sutures in PMRT repairs with a simple stitch configuration. However, further biomechanical studies are required to determine the extent to which tapes contribute to the repaired construct, especially with more complex repair configurations, as the existing evidence displayed a notable amount of methodological heterogeneity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV systematic review of level IV evidence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在进行一项系统评价,以确定在半月板后根部撕裂(PMRT)修复中,超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)带与传统缝线相比是否具有更优的生物力学性能,以及这是否能转化为更优的临床结局。

方法

使用Cochrane对照试验注册库、PubMed和Embase进行系统评价,检索词如下:(半月板或半月板的)和(根部或后角)和(缝线或带或金属丝或绳)。提取与某些生物力学性能(破坏载荷、刚度、循环加载期间及破坏时的位移)、半月板愈合及患者报告结局指标(PROMs)相关的数据。

结果

纳入了七项生物力学研究和两项临床研究。共有232个膝关节进行生物力学测试:81个使用UHMWPE带,151个使用传统缝线(133个使用UHMWPE缝线,18个使用Ethibond[Ethicon])。各研究的测试设置相似,但修复技术存在差异,包括缝线构型、位置和固定方法。总体而言,共识是带的破坏载荷和刚度更高,破坏时的位移与UHMWPE缝线相似。将带与Ethibond比较时也观察到类似趋势,但FiberTape(Arthrex)除外。这种特殊的UHMWPE带在循环加载期间因结滑动而显示出更大的位移。临床上,有73例患者,41例使用UHMWPE带,32例使用UHMWPE缝线(n = 18)或编织聚酯缝线(n = 14)。带在术后1年导致半月板愈合更好,各组的PROMs相似。

结论

在采用简单缝线构型的PMRT修复中,UHMWPE带通常显示出比传统缝线更优的生物力学性能。然而,需要进一步的生物力学研究来确定带对修复结构的贡献程度,特别是在更复杂的修复构型中,因为现有证据显示存在大量方法学异质性。

证据水平

IV级证据的IV级系统评价。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验