Suppr超能文献

髋臼周围截骨术联合髋关节镜检查是否优于单纯髋臼周围截骨术?一项系统评价与Meta分析。

Is Periacetabular Osteotomy With Hip Arthroscopy Superior to Periacetabular Osteotomy Alone? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Clark Sean C, Nagelli Christopher V, Pan Xuankang, Simon Karissa N, Sierra Rafael J, Hevesi Mario

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00875.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There remains ongoing controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy of hip dysplasia, with some advocating for the addition of hip arthroscopy to periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address concomitant labral tears. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical outcomes, complications, and joint preservation of PAO and PAO with hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

A literature search was done, and studies were included if they reported outcomes of PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy, PAO with staged hip arthroscopy, or compared outcomes of PAO alone versus PAO with hip arthroscopy. A meta-analysis was conducted with respect to studies who compared preoperative to postoperative change in modified Harris Hip Score between PAO and PAO with hip arthroscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in this review. Most patients demonstrated preoperative labral pathology. Pooled analysis of the postoperative change in modified Harris Hip Score showed no difference between PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO alone (P = 0.238). Three of six studies comparing both surgical techniques demonstrated a notable postoperative improvement for select outcome scores for the PAO plus hip arthroscopy group but not for the PAO alone group. Of note, no studies demonstrated a notable improvement in the PAO alone group compared with PAO plus hip arthroscopy. The rates of complications and conversion to total hip arthroplasty for both procedures were notably similar.

CONCLUSION

Favorable and comparable clinical outcomes were observed for both PAO alone and PAO with hip arthroscopy. Although PAO with hip arthroscopy demonstrated statistically superior clinical outcomes for some measures, it was never inferior to PAO alone. Randomized controlled studies with extended follow-up are needed to better understand the potential difference in long-term outcomes and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty between these procedures.

摘要

引言

关于髋关节发育不良的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议,一些人主张在髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)中增加髋关节镜检查以处理合并的盂唇撕裂。本系统评价的目的是比较PAO以及PAO联合髋关节镜检查的临床结果、并发症和关节保留情况。

方法

进行文献检索,纳入报告了PAO合并髋关节镜检查、分期髋关节镜检查的PAO的结果,或比较单纯PAO与PAO联合髋关节镜检查结果的研究。对比较PAO与PAO联合髋关节镜检查术前至术后改良Harris髋关节评分变化的研究进行荟萃分析。

结果

本评价纳入了20项研究。大多数患者术前存在盂唇病变。改良Harris髋关节评分术后变化的汇总分析显示,PAO合并髋关节镜检查与单纯PAO之间无差异(P = 0.238)。比较两种手术技术的六项研究中有三项显示,PAO加髋关节镜检查组的某些结局评分术后有显著改善,而单纯PAO组则没有。值得注意的是,没有研究表明单纯PAO组与PAO加髋关节镜检查组相比有显著改善。两种手术的并发症发生率和转为全髋关节置换术的比例显著相似。

结论

单纯PAO和PAO联合髋关节镜检查均观察到良好且可比的临床结果。虽然PAO联合髋关节镜检查在某些指标上显示出统计学上更优的临床结果,但从未低于单纯PAO。需要进行长期随访的随机对照研究,以更好地了解这些手术在长期结局和转为全髋关节置换术的比例方面的潜在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验