Suppr超能文献

确定单颗牙种植修复的临床可接受的PES/WES阈值。

Establishing a Clinically Acceptable PES/WES Threshold for Single-Tooth Implant Restorations.

作者信息

Srimaneekarn Natchalee, Arayapisit Tawepong, Booncharoensombat Supisara, Nanayon Tirakorn, Choterungruangkorn Navin, Kunavisarut Chatchai, Nakaparksin Pranai

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Dec 11;39(6):904-910. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10801.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the esthetic success of single-tooth implant restorations (STIRs) through pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES). This study aimed to utilize PES/WES to (1) establish threshold scores based on detectability and acceptability of a STIR by layperson perception, (2) evaluate the difference in the ability of laypeople and dentists to detect the presence of a STIR, and (3) assess the pink and white deficiencies in relation to the detectability of a STIR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 38 calibrated photographs of STIRs in the anterior region were scored with PES/WES by three prosthodontists. Next, 100 laypeople and 60 dentists were instructed to identify the STIR among the anterior teeth and provide reasoning behind the identification (based on pink and white esthetic criteria). The acceptance of the STIR was recorded. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the threshold scores.

RESULTS

At the PES/WES score of 17, 71% of laypeople could not correctly identify the STIR, and at the PES/WES score of 12, 80% of laypeople accepted the implant. Out of 3,800 occasions, laypeople correctly identified the STIR in 1,770 (46.58%) of those occasions. Among the correctly identified STIRs, 751 (42.43%) of those occasions were identified with pink deficiencies and 1,019 (57.57%) of those occasions were identified with white deficiencies. Out of 2,280 occasions, dentists correctly identified the STIR in 1,869 (81.98%) of those occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

A PES/WES score of 12 indicates the clinically acceptable threshold, and a score of 17 indicates the detectable threshold for an exceptional esthetic outcome. Laypeople tend to accept the implant despite its detectability. For both laypeople and dentists, root convexity/soft tissue color and texture are the most focused criteria of PES/WES, followed by overall white deficiencies, which remain influential. Compared to laypeople, dentists tend to have a higher ability to detect STIRs.

摘要

目的

通过粉红美学评分(PES)和白色美学评分(WES)来确定单颗牙种植修复体(STIR)的美学成功率。本研究旨在利用PES/WES来:(1)根据外行人的感知确定STIR的可检测性和可接受性,建立阈值分数;(2)评估外行人与牙医检测STIR存在的能力差异;(3)评估与STIR可检测性相关的粉红和白色缺陷。

材料与方法

由三位口腔修复医生使用PES/WES对38张前牙区STIR的校准照片进行评分。接下来,指导100名外行人与60名牙医在前牙中识别STIR,并提供识别背后的推理(基于粉红和白色美学标准)。记录对STIR的接受情况。进行受试者操作特征(ROC)分析以确定阈值分数。

结果

在PES/WES评分为17时,71%的外行人无法正确识别STIR;在PES/WES评分为12时,80%的外行人接受种植体。在3800次情况中,外行人在其中1770次(46.58%)中正确识别了STIR。在正确识别的STIR中,其中751次(42.43%)被识别为存在粉红缺陷,1019次(57.57%)被识别为存在白色缺陷。在2280次情况中,牙医在其中1869次(81.98%)中正确识别了STIR。

结论

PES/WES评分为12表明临床可接受阈值,评分为17表明获得卓越美学效果的可检测阈值。尽管STIR具有可检测性,但外行人倾向于接受种植体。对于外行人与牙医而言,牙根凸度/软组织颜色和质地是PES/WES中最受关注的标准,其次是整体白色缺陷,其仍具有影响力。与外行人相比,牙医检测STIR的能力往往更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验