Suppr超能文献

使用一次性包皮环切缝合器行包皮环切术时皮下留置2-0丝线用于内板系带对齐:一种改良手术技术

Utilization of subcutaneous indwelling 2-0 silk thread for inner plate frenulum alignment in circumcision using a disposable circumcision suture device: A modified surgical technique.

作者信息

Wang Kui, Tan Wei, Xiang Kui, Yang Chao

机构信息

Department of Urology and Andrology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, Hubei, China.

Department of Urology and Andrology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Surgery. 2025 Feb;178:108970. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.108970. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective nonrandomized controlled study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and patient experiences between a modified circumcision technique using a disposable circumcision suture device and the standard circumcision method using a disposable circumcision suture device in Chinese patients with excess foreskin or phimosis at our department of urology and andrology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 456 patients underwent circumcision at our center from May 2021 to September 2022, with 228 patients in the modified disposable circumcision suture device group (mean age: 29.8 years; range: 16.8-44.9 years) and 228 patients in the disposable circumcision suture device group (mean age: 29.6 years; range: 16.4-45.1 years). Key surgical outcomes, including surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative edema duration, time for complete shedding of titanium pins, and incision healing time, were recorded and analyzed. Additionally, postoperative complications (such as injury to the penile frenulum, frenulum misalignment, glans ischemia, severe bleeding, and infection) as well as patient experiences (including intraoperative and postoperative pain scores and satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the penis) were evaluated.

RESULTS

All surgeries were successfully completed. The surgical duration was significantly longer in the modified disposable circumcision suture device group (5.7 ± 0.5 minutes) compared to the disposable circumcision suture device group (4.2 ± 0.6 minutes) (P < .05), indicating that the modified procedure took longer to perform. However, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (3.2 ± 0.2 mL vs 3.2 ± 0.1 mL; P > .05), postoperative edema duration (8.2 ± 2.0 days vs 8.9 ± 1.9 days; P > .05), time for complete shedding of titanium pins (13.7 ± 1.3 days vs 13.8 ± 1.3 days; P > .05), and healing time (21.8 ± 1.7 days vs 21.9 ± 1.8 days; P > .05). The incidence of complications, including injury to the penile frenulum (0% vs 0%), glans ischemia (0% vs 0%), severe bleeding (1.3% vs 1.8%), and infection (2.6% vs 3.1%), was comparable between the 2 groups (P > .05 for all comparisons). Notably, the incidence of frenulum misalignment was significantly lower in the modified disposable circumcision suture device group (2.2% vs 16.7% in the disposable circumcision suture device group; P < .05). Moreover, patient satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the penis was higher in the modified disposable circumcision suture device group compared with the disposable circumcision suture device group (96.5% vs 86.8%; P < .05). The pain scores recorded during and after the procedures showed no significant intergroup differences (intraoperative: 1.7 ± 1.0 vs 1.7 ± 0.9; postoperative: 1.3 ± 1.0 vs 1.3 ± 1.0; P > .05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

The modified circumcision technique using a DCSD is associated with a longer operative time; however, it effectively minimizes the risk of preputial frenulum misalignment and enhances postoperative cosmetic satisfaction.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性非随机对照研究旨在比较在我院泌尿外科和男科就诊的包皮过长或包茎中国患者中,使用一次性包皮环切缝合器的改良包皮环切技术与使用一次性包皮环切缝合器的标准包皮环切方法的手术效果、术后并发症及患者体验。

材料与方法

2021年5月至2022年9月,共有456例患者在我院中心接受包皮环切术,其中改良一次性包皮环切缝合器组228例(平均年龄:29.8岁;范围:16.8 - 44.9岁),一次性包皮环切缝合器组228例(平均年龄:29.6岁;范围:16.4 - 45.1岁)。记录并分析关键手术指标,包括手术时间、术中出血量、术后水肿持续时间、钛钉完全脱落时间及切口愈合时间。此外,评估术后并发症(如阴茎系带损伤、系带错位、龟头缺血、严重出血及感染)以及患者体验(包括术中及术后疼痛评分和对阴茎外观的满意度)。

结果

所有手术均成功完成。改良一次性包皮环切缝合器组的手术时间(5.7 ± 0.5分钟)显著长于一次性包皮环切缝合器组(4.2 ± 0.6分钟)(P < 0.05),表明改良手术操作时间更长。然而,两组在术中出血量(3.2 ± 0.2 mL vs 3.2 ± 0.1 mL;P > 0.05)、术后水肿持续时间(8.2 ± 2.0天vs 8.9 ± 1.9天;P > 0.05)、钛钉完全脱落时间(13.7 ± 1.3天vs 13.8 ± 1.3天;P > 0.05)及愈合时间(21.8 ± 1.7天vs 21.9 ± 1.8天;P > 0.05)方面无显著差异。两组并发症发生率,包括阴茎系带损伤(0% vs 0%)、龟头缺血(0% vs 0%)、严重出血(1.3% vs 1.8%)及感染(2.6% vs 3.1%)相当(所有比较P > 0.05)。值得注意的是,改良一次性包皮环切缝合器组的系带错位发生率显著低于一次性包皮环切缝合器组(2.2% vs 16.7%;P < 0.05)。此外,改良一次性包皮环切缝合器组患者对阴茎外观的满意度高于一次性包皮环切缝合器组(96.5% vs 86.8%;P < 0.05)。手术期间及术后记录的疼痛评分显示组间无显著差异(术中:1.7 ± 1.0 vs 1.7 ± 0.9;术后:1.3 ± 1.0 vs 1.3 ± 1.0;所有比较P > 0.05)。

结论

使用一次性包皮环切缝合器的改良包皮环切技术手术时间较长;然而,它能有效降低包皮系带错位风险并提高术后外观满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验