Suppr超能文献

沙尼达尔3号“敲响警钟”:虚拟胸腔重建及其对理解尼安德特人身体结构的意义。

Shanidar 3 'rings the bell': Virtual ribcage reconstruction and its implications for understanding the Neanderthal bauplan.

作者信息

López-Rey José M, García-Martínez Daniel, Bastir Markus

机构信息

Paleoanthropology Group, Department of Paleobiology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain; Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Calle Darwin, 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.

Physical Anthropology Unit, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Calle José Antonio Novais, 12, 28040, Madrid, Spain; Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra (UC), Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal; Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), Paseo de la Sierra de Atapuerca 3, 09002, Burgos, Spain.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2025 Feb;199:103629. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103629. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Abstract

The study of the ribcage is fundamental to understanding hominin evolution. However, ribs and vertebrae are scarce in the fossil record. Although Neanderthals are one of the most represented and, therefore, one of the most studied fossil Homo species, it is controversial whether there is a standardized Neanderthal ribcage morphotype that could differ from modern humans. Hence, we used three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to reconstruct and compare the Neanderthal ribcage of Shanidar 3 with another Neanderthal specimen, Kebara 2, and with 58 Homo sapiens individuals of worldwide distribution. Shape differences among the Neanderthal and H. sapiens ribcages were analyzed by a hierarchical cluster using the Euclidean distances among the permuted Procrustes distances between groups. Size differences between the Neanderthal and H. sapiens ribcages were examined using a permutation test on centroid size. To examine the potential for allometry, we performed a linear regression of Procrustes coordinates on centroid size of the sample, followed by a principal component analysis in form space. Our results show that Shanidar 3 has the 'bell-shaped' thorax typically described for Neanderthals. In fact, the shapes of both Shanidar 3 and Kebara 2 ribcages cluster apart from that of H. sapiens, being closer to cold-adapted individuals. The study of the centroid size supports similarities between Neanderthals and cold-adapted H. sapiens since significant size differences were found only between Neanderthals and temperate/tropical recent humans. The linear regression and principal component analysis showed an allometric relationship between ribcage size and shape, suggesting Neanderthals had larger and stockier ribcages than most H. sapiens, although they fall within the H. sapiens range of variation. Finally, ribcage similarities found between Shanidar 3 and Kebara 2, both inhabiting warm Levantine locations during the Upper Pleistocene, could challenge the conventional idea of a cold-adapted bauplan in Neanderthals.

摘要

对胸腔的研究是理解人类进化的基础。然而,肋骨和椎骨在化石记录中很稀少。尽管尼安德特人是化石记录中最具代表性、因而也是研究最多的化石智人物种之一,但是否存在一种与现代人类不同的标准化尼安德特人胸腔形态类型仍存在争议。因此,我们使用三维几何形态测量学方法,将沙尼达尔3号的尼安德特人胸腔与另一个尼安德特人标本凯巴拉2号以及58名来自世界各地的智人个体进行重建和比较。通过层次聚类分析,利用组间排列后的普氏距离之间的欧氏距离,分析了尼安德特人和智人胸腔之间的形状差异。使用质心大小的置换检验来检查尼安德特人和智人胸腔之间的大小差异。为了检验异速生长的可能性,我们对样本的质心大小进行了普氏坐标的线性回归,然后在形态空间中进行主成分分析。我们的结果表明,沙尼达尔3号具有通常描述为尼安德特人的“钟形”胸廓。事实上,沙尼达尔3号和凯巴拉2号胸腔的形状与智人的形状聚类分开,更接近适应寒冷的个体。质心大小的研究支持了尼安德特人和适应寒冷的智人之间的相似性,因为仅在尼安德特人和温带/热带现代人类之间发现了显著的大小差异。线性回归和主成分分析表明胸腔大小和形状之间存在异速生长关系,这表明尼安德特人的胸腔比大多数智人更大、更粗壮,尽管它们仍在智人的变异范围内。最后,在上新世晚期都居住在温暖的黎凡特地区的沙尼达尔3号和凯巴拉2号之间发现的胸腔相似性,可能会挑战尼安德特人适应寒冷的体型构造这一传统观念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验