Hoeper Marius M, Rosenkranz Stephan, Badesch David B, Humbert Marc, Langleben David, McConnell John W, Hegab Sara, Rahner Claudia, Richard Jean-François, Ghofrani Hossein-Ardeschir
Clinic for Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Hannover Medical School, member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany.
Department of Cardiology - Internal Medicine III, Cologne University Heart Center, Cologne, Germany; Cologne Cardiovascular Research Center (CCRC), Cologne University Heart Center, Cologne, Germany.
Respir Med. 2025 Jan;236:107910. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107910. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Risk stratification is an essential part of evaluating disease severity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study applied the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk model to the Phase 3 PATENT-1/2 studies of riociguat.
This was a post hoc analysis of PATENT-1 and PATENT-2. Log-rank tests of Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to compare the risk strata at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 regarding time to clinical worsening and survival at 2 years in the PATENT-2 population.
Data on COMPERA 2.0 status at baseline were available for 214 patients with riociguat and 100 with placebo; overall, 120 patients were identified as intermediate-low risk and 96 as intermediate-high risk. At PATENT-1 Week 12, improvements in COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and median 6-min walk distance were seen with riociguat vs placebo in patients assessed as intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk at baseline by COMPERA 2.0. More patients improved their COMPERA 2.0 risk status with riociguat vs placebo in the intermediate-low (38 % vs 22 %) and intermediate-high risk groups (42 % vs 31 %). COMPERA 2.0 assessed at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 discriminated between risk strata for survival and clinical worsening in PATENT-2 at 2 years (p ≤ .001 for all analyses).
In conclusion, this analysis supports the risk-reduction benefits of riociguat in patients with PAH at intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk, and externally validated the utility of COMPERA 2.0 in the long-term risk assessment of patients from a clinical trial population.
风险分层是评估肺动脉高压(PAH)患者疾病严重程度的重要组成部分。本研究将4层COMPERA 2.0风险模型应用于利奥西呱的3期PATENT-1/2研究。
这是对PATENT-1和PATENT-2的事后分析。进行Kaplan-Meier曲线的对数秩检验,以比较PATENT-1基线和第12周时PATENT-2人群中临床恶化时间和2年生存率的风险分层。
共有214例使用利奥西呱的患者和100例使用安慰剂的患者有基线COMPERA 2.0状态的数据;总体而言,120例患者被确定为中低风险,96例为中高风险。在PATENT-1第12周时,对于基线时被COMPERA 2.0评估为中低风险和中高风险的患者,与安慰剂相比,利奥西呱使COMPERA 2.0风险分层和6分钟步行距离中位数得到改善。在中低风险组(38%对22%)和中高风险组(42%对31%)中,与安慰剂相比,更多使用利奥西呱的患者改善了COMPERA 2.0风险状态。在PATENT-1基线和第12周时评估的COMPERA 2.0能够区分PATENT-2中2年时生存和临床恶化的风险分层(所有分析的p≤0.001)。
总之,该分析支持利奥西呱对中低风险和中高风险PAH患者的降低风险益处,并在外部验证了COMPERA 2.0在来自临床试验人群患者的长期风险评估中的效用。