• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预切开内镜黏膜切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析

The efficacy and safety of precutting-endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yi, Wu Zhengjie

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Jun;34(3):177-186. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2440403. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2440403
PMID:39668459
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques have been reported for colorectal tumors. Precutting-EMR (PEMR) is a modification wherein a circumferential mucosal incision is made around a lesion to facilitate en bloc resection. This review compared the efficacy and safety of PEMR with conventional EMR for colorectal lesions.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for comparative studies available before February 15, 2024. This systematic review and meta-analysis were recorded in PROSPERO, identified as CRD42024509143.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight studies underwent screening of which seven studies were found eligible. We found no significant difference in en bloc resection rates but complete resection rates were significantly better with PEMR. The duration of the procedure was significantly longer with PEMR as compared to EMR. There was no difference in the risk of delayed bleeding and recurrence between the two groups but the risk of perforation was significantly increased with PEMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PEMR for colorectal lesions can improve complete resection rates, albeit at the cost of increased duration of the procedure and higher perforation rates compared to conventional EMR. PEMR may also have a tendency of better en bloc resection rates which needs to be confirmed by further studies.

摘要

背景

已有多种改良内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)技术用于结直肠肿瘤。预切开EMR(PEMR)是一种改良技术,即在病变周围进行环形黏膜切口以利于整块切除。本综述比较了PEMR与传统EMR治疗结直肠病变的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,查找2024年2月15日前的比较研究。本系统评价和荟萃分析已在PROSPERO中登记,登记号为CRD42024509143。

结果

共筛选了208项研究,其中7项研究符合纳入标准。我们发现整块切除率无显著差异,但PEMR的完整切除率明显更高。与EMR相比,PEMR的手术时间明显更长。两组之间延迟出血和复发风险无差异,但PEMR的穿孔风险显著增加。

结论

与传统EMR相比,使用PEMR治疗结直肠病变可提高完整切除率,尽管代价是手术时间延长和穿孔率升高。PEMR的整块切除率可能也有提高的趋势,这需要进一步研究证实。

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of precutting-endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预切开内镜黏膜切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Jun;34(3):177-186. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2440403. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
8
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal sessile/non-polypoid lesions.内镜黏膜切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠平坦/无蒂病变的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Aug;31(6):835-847. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2022.2032759. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.