Mitra Biswadev, Settle Kate, Koolstra Christine, Talarico Carly, Smit De Villiers, Cameron Peter A
Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14546. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14546. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) can stratify the risk of violence and aggression in EDs. The aim of the present study was to report the initial uptake of introducing this checklist and associations with unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence in two EDs.
The BVC was recommended in all patient care episodes. This retrospective review included routinely collected data from an adult tertiary referral hospital and a suburban mixed paediatric and adult ED over a 12-month period. The primary outcome variable was completion of at least one BVC score and the secondary outcome was unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence episodes within the EDs.
There were 121 330 presentations, of which 108 274 were included in the present study. The BVC was completed for 42 675 (39.4%) presentations. Using a cut-off score of 3, BVC had a specificity of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.1-99.2) and a sensitivity of 15.6% (95% CI 12.5-19.3) for unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events. Completion of a BVC was independently associated with more unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events (adjusted odds ratio 1.37; 95% CI 1.12-1.66).
The BVC was highly specific for violence and aggression but had low sensitivity. Completion of the BVC was associated with more frequent unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events, suggesting that high-risk patients might be identified intuitively, without formal scoring. Further exploration of the utility of the BVC in the ED is indicated with a focus on strategies to prevent violence and aggression.
布罗泽特暴力检查表(BVC)可对急诊科暴力和攻击风险进行分层。本研究的目的是报告引入该检查表的初步应用情况,以及与两家急诊科潜在或实际暴力事件的非计划警报之间的关联。
在所有患者护理过程中均推荐使用BVC。这项回顾性研究纳入了一家成人三级转诊医院和一家郊区儿科与成人混合急诊科在12个月期间常规收集的数据。主要结局变量是至少完成一次BVC评分,次要结局是急诊科内潜在或实际暴力事件的非计划警报。
共有121330人次就诊,其中108274人次纳入本研究。42675人次(39.4%)就诊完成了BVC。以3分为临界值,BVC对潜在或实际暴力事件非计划警报的特异性为99.2%(95%置信区间[CI]99.1 - 99.2),敏感性为15.6%(95%CI 12.5 - 19.3)。完成BVC与更多潜在或实际暴力事件的非计划警报独立相关(调整比值比1.37;95%CI 1.12 - 1.66)。
BVC对暴力和攻击具有高度特异性,但敏感性较低。完成BVC与潜在或实际暴力事件更频繁的非计划警报相关,这表明可能无需正式评分就能直观地识别高危患者。建议进一步探索BVC在急诊科的效用,重点关注预防暴力和攻击的策略。