Suppr超能文献

探索美国言语语言病理学家在喉镜检查期间局部鼻麻醉的培训及应用情况。

Exploring speech-language pathologists' training and use of topical nasal anaesthesia during laryngeal endoscopy in the United States.

作者信息

Baker-Rush Meredith L, Dineen Michelle Zemsky, Kaseda Erin T

机构信息

College of Health Professions, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Elmhurst University, Elmhurst, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13140. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13140.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) perform nasal laryngoscopy (LE) to assess voice and dysphagia-related disorders. The procedural aspects may include the use of topical nasal anaesthesia.

AIMS

To explore the practice patterns of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)-certified SLPs use of anaesthesia during laryngeal endoscopy procedures in the United States METHODS & PROCEDURES: Data were collected via a brief computerized survey. A mixed methodology was employed. National representation across the United States was achieved.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Limited pre-licensure training in LE with the majority of educational content embedded in a voice course (64.7%) and post-academic training via live continuing education (CE) (58.8-72.5%). Pharmacology training was notably lacking in pre- and post-licensure groups. A total of 50% of post-licensure training occurred via interprofessional (IP) mentorship with significant correlations (LE confidence and skills r = 0.64, < 0.001, anaesthesia r = 0.74, < 0.001). However, when looking at confidence of knowledge as compared with skills for the procedure, 83% of participants reported high levels of confidence in their knowledge, yet 31.25% reported high levels of confidence in the skills to perform LE. Conversely, when looking at confidence of anaesthesia knowledge (20.83%) as compared with skills, participants were less confident in their knowledge yet more confident in the skills (31.25%) to administer anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Bandura's Social Cognitive Learning Theory of 1986 with standardized use of vicarious and self-regulatory capabilities based on prior experiences and the use of IP mentorship during pre- and post-licensure education for LE may be beneficial in training. Limitations and suggestions for future research are additionally reported.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject Laryngeal endoscopy is an advanced competency procedure completed by SLPs used in the evaluation and treatment of voice and swallowing disorders. Standards for competency lack consistency. Simultaneously, topical nasal anaesthesia may be a component of some exams, yet training and, subsequently, competency is inconsistent. Education and training for use of anaesthesia and navigating potential complications is not a required element of graduate training for SLPs. While SLPs may be independent practitioners of the laryngeal endoscopy procedure, it is unclear if they, or others, are administering the anaesthesia within an IP practice model. What this study adds to the existing knowledge Laryngeal endoscopy is comparatively new within the field of SLP. There are no studies investigating the knowledge, skills, and practice patterns of SLPs related to the use of anaesthetic agents during such procedures. This study adds to the literature regarding the practices of a sample of SLPs in the United States regarding use of topical anaesthesia during flexible laryngeal endoscopy, their training in topical anaesthesia and use/barriers of IP teams during flexible laryngeal endoscopy. Initial insight relative to the variability of training and practice is documented with potential learning needs for SLPs related to pharmacology, patient safety and IP practice. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? This study offers considerations for SLP graduate and postgraduate training in the areas of topical nasal anaesthesia use and laryngeal endoscopy procedures. The results show variability in training for completion of these exams which may contribute to patient safety and outcomes. Promoting an IP approach to care, specifically roles and responsibilities related to use of anaesthesia, may further benefit those we serve.

摘要

背景

言语语言病理学家(SLP)进行鼻喉镜检查(LE)以评估嗓音和吞咽困难相关疾病。操作方面可能包括使用局部鼻腔麻醉。

目的

探讨美国言语语言听力协会(ASHA)认证的SLP在美国喉镜检查过程中使用麻醉的实践模式。

方法与步骤

通过简短的计算机化调查收集数据。采用了混合方法。实现了全美范围内的代表性抽样。

结果与结论

在获得执照前,关于LE的培训有限,大部分教育内容包含在嗓音课程中(64.7%),且通过现场继续教育(CE)进行学术后培训(58.8 - 72.5%)。在获得执照前和后的培训组中,药理学培训明显缺乏。共有50%的获得执照后的培训是通过跨专业(IP)指导进行的,且存在显著相关性(LE信心和技能r = 0.64,< 0.001,麻醉r = 0.74,< 0.001)。然而,当将知识信心与操作技能进行比较时,83%的参与者表示对自己的知识有高度信心,但31.25%的参与者表示对进行LE的技能有高度信心。相反,当比较麻醉知识信心(20.83%)与技能时,参与者对知识的信心较低,但对实施麻醉的技能(31.25%)更有信心。

结论与启示

1986年班杜拉的社会认知学习理论,基于先前经验对替代和自我调节能力进行标准化运用,并在LE的执照前和执照后教育期间使用IP指导,可能对培训有益。此外还报告了局限性和对未来研究的建议。

本文补充内容

关于该主题的已知信息 喉镜检查是SLP完成的一项高级技能操作,用于评估和治疗嗓音及吞咽障碍。技能标准缺乏一致性。同时,局部鼻腔麻醉可能是某些检查的一部分,但培训以及随后的技能水平并不一致。麻醉使用及应对潜在并发症方面的教育和培训并非SLP研究生培训的必需内容。虽然SLP可能是喉镜检查操作的独立从业者,但不清楚他们或其他人是否在IP实践模式下实施麻醉。本研究对现有知识的补充 喉镜检查在SLP领域相对较新。尚无研究调查SLP在这类操作中使用麻醉剂方面的知识、技能和实践模式。本研究补充了关于美国SLP样本在软性喉镜检查期间使用局部麻醉的实践、他们在局部麻醉方面的培训以及IP团队在软性喉镜检查期间的使用/障碍等方面的文献。记录了关于培训和实践变异性的初步见解,以及SLP在药理学、患者安全和IP实践方面潜在的学习需求。这项工作的实际和临床意义是什么?本研究为SLP研究生和研究生后在局部鼻腔麻醉使用和喉镜检查操作方面的培训提供了思考。结果显示这些检查的培训存在变异性,这可能影响患者安全和治疗结果。推广IP护理方法,特别是与麻醉使用相关的角色和责任,可能会进一步造福我们的服务对象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验