Hsia Amie W, Latour Lawrence L, Somani Sana, Lomahan Carolyn A, Kim Yongwoo, Lynch John K, Luby Marie
NIH/NINDS, Stroke Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Comprehensive Stroke Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2024 Nov;4(6). doi: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001441. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
The characterization of hemorrhage following acute stroke intervention has largely been CT-based. We sought to compare MRI- and CT-based scoring of hemorrhage after acute endovascular therapy (EVT) applying the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC) to assess inter-modal agreement and quantify inter-rater agreement.
Consecutive acute stroke patients were included in this retrospective study if they: i) had MRI and CT ≤12 hours of each other OR ii) had CT bracketed by MRI pre- and post-CT [i.e. MRI-CT-MRI] ≤7 days post-EVT. The concordance of the HBC ratings by consensus panel were compared between CT and T2*GRE MRI.
For the 87 EVT-treated patients included, median age was 68 years [60-74], admit NIHSS 18 [13-23], 47% were treated with IV/IA thrombolytics, and 93% were successfully recanalized (mTICI 2b/3). Hemorrhage was detected on at least one modality in 60% (52/87) of patients. We found a 68% (59/87, 95% CI [57-77%]) agreement overall between CT and MRI for hemorrhage classification post-EVT. MRI had the best inter-rater agreement for HBC 0 (no hemorrhage) with excellent concordance (κ=0.882), compared to CT (κ=0.683). T2*GRE MRI tended to have increased sensitivity to scattered petechial hemorrhage (HBC 1a) as compared to CT with 17% (2/12) inter-modal agreement. The inter-rater agreement of HBC class 2 (i.e. PH-2) was substantial for MRI (κ=0.781) and excellent in CT (κ=0.951), with 67% (8 /12) inter-modal agreement. SAH was detected in 24% (21/87) of patients on CT and/or MRI with 29% (6/21) inter-modal agreement.
With the exception of SAH and minor petechial hemorrhagic transformation, we found that MRI and CT are overall interchangeable for detecting and classifying hemorrhage after endovascular therapy, reassuring findings for both clinical-decision making and research application. Given the complexity of hemorrhage subtypes post-EVT, work to further refine a post-EVT hemorrhage classification scale with clinical correlation would be beneficial.
急性卒中干预后出血情况的特征描述主要基于CT。我们旨在比较应用海德堡出血分类法(HBC)对急性血管内治疗(EVT)后出血进行的基于MRI和CT的评分,以评估不同模式间的一致性并量化评分者间的一致性。
连续纳入的急性卒中患者需满足以下条件:i)彼此间隔≤12小时进行了MRI和CT检查;或ii)在EVT后≤7天内有MRI在CT前后进行检查(即MRI-CT-MRI)。比较共识小组对CT和T2*GRE MRI的HBC评级的一致性。
纳入的87例接受EVT治疗的患者中,中位年龄为68岁[60-74],入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分为18分[13-23],47%接受了静脉/动脉内溶栓治疗,93%成功再通(改良脑梗死溶栓分级(mTICI)2b/3级)。60%(52/87)的患者在至少一种检查模式上检测到出血。我们发现EVT后CT和MRI在出血分类方面总体一致性为68%(59/87,95%可信区间[57-77%])。对于HBC 0(无出血),MRI的评分者间一致性最佳,一致性极佳(κ=0.882),而CT的一致性为(κ=0.683)。与CT相比,T2*GRE MRI对散在的瘀点性出血(HBC 1a)的敏感性更高,不同模式间一致性为17%(2/12)。HBC 2级(即PH-2)的MRI评分者间一致性较高(κ=0.781),CT的一致性极佳(κ=0.951),不同模式间一致性为67%(8/12)。24%(21/87)的患者在CT和/或MRI上检测到蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH),不同模式间一致性为29%(6/21)。
除SAH和轻微瘀点性出血转化外,我们发现MRI和CT在血管内治疗后出血的检测和分类方面总体上可相互替代,这一结果对于临床决策和研究应用均令人安心。鉴于EVT后出血亚型的复杂性,进一步完善具有临床相关性的EVT后出血分类量表将是有益的。