• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学信息系统的安全性与可用性——一项系统综述

Safety and usability of oncology information systems - a systematic review.

作者信息

Cihoric Nikola, Riggenbach Elena, Putora Paul Martin, Dennstädt Fabio

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and the University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 28;14:1231757. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1231757. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1231757
PMID:39669363
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11634827/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digitalization has become integral to healthcare and specifically cancer treatment. Healthcare providers in oncology widely use electronic data collection and management systems in contemporary clinical practice. However, some reports point to severe problems regarding usability, which negatively impact the clinical workforce, as well as safety issues related to electronic health records, which potentially endanger patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate current scientific literature on the usability and safety aspects of electronic health records in oncology.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review on PubMed and Scopus to identify articles on the usability and safety aspects of electronic health records and clinical information systems utilized in oncological care. Two authors independently evaluated available literature according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, we quantitatively analyzed and classified the reported findings.

RESULTS

Our literature research strategy retrieved 1032 articles. We included seven articles for further processing. Three projects focused on the assessment of electronic health record functionality, three projects described the process of user-driven design, and one article described remediation procedures introduced to compensate inability of computer systems to adapt to user requirements.

CONCLUSION

Literature on the usability and safety of electronic health records in oncology is sparse. It is essential to raise awareness and start systematic activity to promote research on the usability of electronic health records in oncology.

摘要

背景

数字化已成为医疗保健尤其是癌症治疗不可或缺的一部分。肿瘤学领域的医疗服务提供者在当代临床实践中广泛使用电子数据收集和管理系统。然而,一些报告指出了有关可用性的严重问题,这些问题对临床工作人员产生负面影响,以及与电子健康记录相关的安全问题,这可能危及患者。本系统评价旨在评估当前关于肿瘤学中电子健康记录的可用性和安全性方面的科学文献。

方法

我们在PubMed和Scopus上进行了系统的文献综述,以识别关于肿瘤护理中使用的电子健康记录和临床信息系统的可用性和安全性方面的文章。两位作者根据预定义的纳入和排除标准独立评估可用文献。最后,我们对报告的结果进行了定量分析和分类。

结果

我们的文献研究策略检索到1032篇文章。我们纳入了7篇文章进行进一步处理。三个项目侧重于电子健康记录功能的评估,三个项目描述了用户驱动设计的过程,一篇文章描述了为弥补计算机系统无法适应用户需求而引入的补救程序。

结论

关于肿瘤学中电子健康记录的可用性和安全性的文献很少。提高认识并开展系统活动以促进对肿瘤学中电子健康记录可用性的研究至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7832/11634827/69d74460545d/fonc-14-1231757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7832/11634827/69d74460545d/fonc-14-1231757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7832/11634827/69d74460545d/fonc-14-1231757-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and usability of oncology information systems - a systematic review.肿瘤学信息系统的安全性与可用性——一项系统综述
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 28;14:1231757. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1231757. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.电子健康记录设计对可用性和用药安全的影响:系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2.
4
Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.电子病历界面设计中的可用性与安全性:近期文献综述与指南制定
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):805-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720815576827. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
5
Usability testing of Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting (ADAPT) decision support for integrating care-based counseling of pre-diabetes in an electronic health record.通过行动计划目标预防糖尿病(ADAPT)决策支持系统在电子健康记录中整合基于护理的糖尿病前期咨询的可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):636-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”的电子健康素养需求:可用性的启发式评估
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Oct 1;14(Fall):1f. eCollection 2017 Fall.
7
Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.电子健康记录中的导航:安全与可用性文献综述
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Mar;67:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.注意差距。一项旨在识别电子健康记录实施过程中的可用性和安全性挑战及实践的系统综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Nov 16;7(4):1069-1087. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

本文引用的文献

1
The reproducibility issues that haunt health-care AI.困扰医疗保健人工智能的可重复性问题。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7943):402-403. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00023-2.
2
Prevalence and Sources of Duplicate Information in the Electronic Medical Record.电子病历中重复信息的流行率和来源。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33348.
3
Quantifying the Electronic Health Record Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Care.量化头颈部癌症护理中的电子健康记录负担。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Aug;13(4):857-864. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756422. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Efficiency and Safety of Electronic Health Records in Switzerland-A Comparative Analysis of 2 Commercial Systems in Hospitals.瑞士电子健康记录的效率和安全性-对 2 家医院商业系统的比较分析。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Sep 1;18(6):645-651. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001009. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Quantitating and assessing interoperability between electronic health records.定量评估电子健康记录之间的互操作性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):753-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab289.
6
Applying User-Centered Design in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to Facilitate Patient-Centered Care in Oncology.运用以用户为中心的设计理念于电子健康记录(EHR)中,以促进肿瘤学中的以患者为中心的护理。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:833-839. eCollection 2020.
7
Development of safety and usability guideline for clinical information system.临床信息系统安全性和可用性指南的制定。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 2;100(13):e25276. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025276.
8
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.更新系统评价报告指南:PRISMA 2020 声明的制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Use of LOINC for interoperability between organisations poses a risk to safety.在组织间使用LOINC进行互操作性存在安全风险。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e569. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30244-2. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Improving Cancer Data Interoperability: The Promise of the Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) Initiative.改善癌症数据互操作性:最小共同肿瘤学数据元素 (mCODE) 倡议的承诺。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Oct;4:993-1001. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00059.