Ross Andrew G, Connolly Kevin, Vögele Stefan, Kuckshinrichs Wilhelm
Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK), Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE), Forschungszentrum, Jülich, Germany.
Fraser of Allander Institute, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Water Res X. 2024 Apr 16;23:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100223. eCollection 2024 May 1.
Recognising the urgent need to address water scarcity resulting from climate change, there is a growing push to enhance the resilience of water (and related) systems. For instance, policymakers are now urging companies to shift from short-term focused strategies towards long-term approaches to effectively manage water scarcity. This paper utilises a custom-built dynamic multisectoral model to assess the socio-economic impacts at a macro-level of temporary water scarcity. The focus of the analysis is to identify the effects that varying levels of investment foresight may have on economic resilience. Specifically, the model incorporates often overlooked factors such as behavioural and resilience aspects. By considering these key elements, a more comprehensive understanding of the system-wide implications of water scarcity on the broader economy is provided. The analysis shows how firms' foresight, or lack thereof, impacts their response to water scarcity and the subsequent impact on the economy. Sector-specific analyses shed light on the potential negative impacts of water scarcity on sectors like agriculture, food, and electricity production and distribution. Yet, the analysis also reveals that certain sectors can benefit from competitiveness effects, which can mitigate the adverse economic implications of water scarcity. However, it should be noted that these sectors may contribute to a catch-up effect on water use. The policy recommendations arising from this research emphasise the promotion of anticipation and preparedness among firms. It is crucial to prioritise resilience-building measures in all sectors, whether they directly rely on water or not.
认识到应对气候变化导致的水资源短缺的迫切需求,增强水(及相关)系统的复原力的呼声日益高涨。例如,政策制定者现在敦促企业从短期聚焦战略转向长期方法,以有效管理水资源短缺。本文利用一个定制的动态多部门模型,在宏观层面评估临时水资源短缺的社会经济影响。分析的重点是确定不同水平的投资远见可能对经济复原力产生的影响。具体而言,该模型纳入了行为和复原力等常被忽视的因素。通过考虑这些关键要素,能更全面地理解水资源短缺对更广泛经济的全系统影响。分析表明企业的远见或缺乏远见如何影响其对水资源短缺的应对以及随后对经济的影响。特定部门的分析揭示了水资源短缺对农业、食品以及电力生产和分配等部门的潜在负面影响。然而,分析还表明某些部门可从竞争力效应中受益,这可减轻水资源短缺的不利经济影响。不过,应注意这些部门可能会导致用水方面的追赶效应。本研究提出的政策建议强调促进企业的预期和准备。在所有部门,无论是否直接依赖水,将复原力建设措施列为优先事项至关重要。