Hartinger Stella M, Palmeiro-Silva Yasna K, Llerena-Cayo Camila, Blanco-Villafuerte Luciana, Escobar Luis E, Diaz Avriel, Sarmiento Juliana Helo, Lescano Andres G, Melo Oscar, Rojas-Rueda David, Takahashi Bruno, Callaghan Max, Chesini Francisco, Dasgupta Shouro, Posse Carolina Gil, Gouveia Nelson, Martins de Carvalho Aline, Miranda-Chacón Zaray, Mohajeri Nahid, Pantoja Chrissie, Robinson Elizabeth J Z, Salas Maria Fernanda, Santiago Raquel, Sauma Enzo, Santos-Vega Mauricio, Scamman Daniel, Sergeeva Milena, Souza de Camargo Tatiana, Sorensen Cecilia, Umaña Juan D, Yglesias-González Marisol, Walawender Maria, Buss Daniel, Romanello Marina
Centro Latino Americano de Excelencia en Cambio Climático y Salud, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
In 2023, a series of climatological and political events unfolded, partly driving forward the global climate and health agenda while simultaneously exposing important disparities and vulnerabilities to climate-related events. On the policy front, a significant step forward was marked by the inaugural Health Day at COP28, acknowledging the profound impacts of climate change on health. However, the first-ever Global Stocktake showed an important gap between the current progress and the targets outlined in the Paris Agreement, underscoring the urgent need for further and decisive action. From a Latin American perspective, some questions arise: How do we achieve the change that is needed? How to address the vulnerabilities to climate change in a region with long-standing social inequities? How do we promote intersectoral collaboration to face a complex problem such as climate change? The debate is still ongoing, and in many instances, it is just starting. The renamed regional centre Countdown Latin America (previously named Countdown South America) expanded its geographical scope adding Mexico and five Central American countries: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Panama, as a response to the need for stronger collaboration in a region with significant social disparities, including research capacities and funding. The centre is an independent and multidisciplinary collaboration that tracks the links between health and climate change in Latin America, following the global Lancet Countdown's methodologies and five domains. The Countdown Latin America work hinges on the commitment of 23 regional academic institutions, United Nations agencies, and 34 researchers who generously contribute their time and expertise. Building from the first report, the 2023 report of the Countdown Latin America, presents 34 indicators that track the relationship between health and climate change up to 2022, aiming at providing evidence to public decision-making with the purpose of improving the health and wellbeing of Latin American populations and reducing social inequities through climate actions focusing on health. This report shows that Latin American populations continue to observe a growing exposure to changing climatic conditions. A warming trend has been observed across all countries in Latin America, with severe direct impacts. In 2022, people were exposed to ambient temperatures, on average, 0.38 °C higher than in 1986-2005, with Paraguay experiencing the highest anomaly (+1.9 °C), followed by Argentina (+1.2 °C) and Uruguay (+0.9 °C) (indicator 1.1.1). In 2013-2022, infants were exposed to 248% more heatwave days and people over 65 years old were exposed to 271% more heatwave days than in 1986-2005 (indicator 1.1.2). Also, compared to 1991-2000, in 2013-2022, there were 256 and 189 additional annual hours per person, during which ambient heat posed at least moderate and high risk of heat stress during light outdoor physical activity in Latin America, respectively (indicator 1.1.3). Finally, the region had a 140% increase in heat-related mortality from 2000-2009 to 2013-2022 (indicator 1.1.4). Changes in ecosystems have led to an increased risk of wildfires, exposing individuals to very or extremely high fire danger for more extended periods (indicator 1.2.1). Additionally, the transmission potential for dengue by mosquitoes has risen by 54% from 1951-1960 to 2013-2022 (indicator 1.3), which aligns with the recent outbreaks and increasing dengue cases observed across Latin America in recent months. Based on the 2023 report of the Countdown Latin America, there are three key messages that Latin America needs to further explore and advance for a health-centred climate-resilient development. . The findings show that adaptation policies in Latin America remain weak, with a pressing need for robust vulnerability and adaptation (V&A) assessments to address climate risks effectively. Unfortunately, such assessments are scarce. Up to 2021, Brazil is the only country that has completed and officially reported a V&A to the 2021 Global Survey conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO). Argentina, Guatemala, and Panama have also conducted them, but they have not been reported (indicator 2.1.1). Similarly, efforts in developing and implementing Health National Adaptation Plans (HNAPs) are varied and limited in scope. Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay are the only countries that have an HNAP (indicator 2.1.2). Moreover, self-reported city-level climate change risk assessments are very limited in the region (indicator 2.1.3). The collaboration between meteorological and health sectors remains insufficient, with only Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala self-reporting some level of integration (indicator 2.2.1), hindering comprehensive responses to climate-related health risks in the region. Additionally, despite the urgent need for action, there has been minimal progress in increasing urban greenspaces across the region since 2015, with only Colombia, Nicaragua, and Venezuela showing slight improvements (indicator 2.2.2). Compounding these challenges is the decrease in funding for climate change adaptation projects in Latin America, as evidenced by the 16% drop in funds allocated by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) in 2022 compared to 2021. Alarmingly, none of the funds approved in 2022 were directed toward climate change and health projects, highlighting a critical gap in addressing health-related climate risks (indicator 2.2.3). From a vulnerability perspective, the Mosquito Risk Index (MoRI) indicates an overall decrease in severe mosquito-borne disease risk in the region due to improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) (indicator 2.3.1). Brazil and Paraguay were the only countries that showed an increase in this indicator. It is worth noting that significant temporal variation within and between countries still persists, suggesting inadequate preparedness for climate-related changes. Overall, population health is not solely determined by the health sector, nor are climate policies a sole responsibility of the environmental sector. More and stronger intersectoral collaboration is needed to pave development pathways that consider solid adaptation to climate change, greater reductions of GHG emissions, and that increase social equity and population health. These policies involve sectors such as finance, transport, energy, housing, health, and agriculture, requiring institutional structures and policy instruments that allow long-term intersectoral collaboration. . In Latin America, there is a notable disparity in energy transition, with electricity generation from coal increasing by an average of 2.6% from 1991-2000 to 2011-2020, posing a challenge to efforts aimed at phasing out coal (indicator 3.1.1). However, this percentage increase is conservative as it may not include all the fossil fuels for thermoelectric electricity generation, especially during climate-related events and when hydropower is affected (Panel 4). Yet, renewable energy sources have been growing, increasing by an average of 5.7% during the same period. Access to clean fuels for cooking remains a concern, with 46.3% of the rural population in Central America and 23.3% in South America lacking access to clean fuels in 2022 (indicator 3.1.2). It is crucial to highlight the concerning overreliance on fossil fuels, particularly liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as a primary cooking fuel. A significant majority of Latin American populations, approximately 74.6%, rely on LPG for cooking. Transitioning to cleaner heating and cooking alternatives could also have a health benefit by reducing household air pollution-related mortality. Fossil fuels continue to dominate road transport energy in Latin America, accounting for 96%, although some South American countries are increasing the use of biofuels (indicator 3.1.3). Premature mortality attributable to fossil-fuel-derived PM has shown varied trends across countries, increasing by 3.9% from 2005 to 2020 across Latin America, which corresponds to 123.5 premature deaths per million people (indicator 3.2.1). The Latin American countries with the highest premature mortality rate attributable to PM in 2020 were Chile, Peru, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Paraguay. Of the total premature deaths attributable to PM in 2020, 19.1% was from transport, 12.3% from households, 11.6% from industry, and 11% from agriculture. From emission and capture of GHG perspective, commodity-driven deforestation and expansion of agricultural land remain major contributors to tree cover loss in the region, accounting for around 80% of the total loss (indicator 3.3). Additionally, animal-based food production in Latin America contributes 85% to agricultural CO equivalent emissions, with Argentina, Brazil, Panama, Paraguay, and Uruguay ranking highest in per capita emissions (indicator 3.4.1). From a health perspective, in 2020, approximately 870,000 deaths were associated with imbalanced diets, of which 155,000 (18%) were linked to high intake of red and processed meat and dairy products (indicator 3.4.2). Energy transition in Latin America is still in its infancy, and as a result, millions of people are currently exposed to dangerous levels of air pollution and energy poverty (i.e., lack of access to essential energy sources or services). As shown in this report, the levels of air pollution, outdoors and indoors, are a significant problem in the whole region, with marked disparities between urban and rural areas. In 2022, Peru, Chile, Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, El Salvador, Brazil, Uruguay, Honduras, Panama, and Nicaragua were in the top 100 most polluted countries globally. Transitioning to cleaner sources of energy, phasing out fossil fuels, and promoting better energy efficiency in the industrial and housing sectors are not only climate mitigation measures but also huge health and economic opportunities for more prosperous and healthy societies. . Climate change poses significant economic costs, with investments in mitigation and adaptation measures progressing slowly. In 2022, economic losses due to weather-related extreme events in Latin America were US$15.6 billion -an amount mainly driven by floods and landslides in Brazil-representing 0.28% of Latin America's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (indicator 4.1.1). In contrast to high-income countries, most of these losses lack insurance coverage, imposing a substantial financial strain on affected families and governments. Heat-related mortality among individuals aged 65 and older in Latin America reached alarming levels, with losses exceeding the equivalent of the average income of 451,000 people annually (indicator 4.1.2). Moreover, the total potential income loss due to heat-related labour capacity reduction amounted to 1.34% of regional GDP, disproportionately affecting the agriculture and construction sectors (indicator 4.1.3). Additionally, the economic toll of premature mortality from air pollution was substantial, equivalent to a significant portion of regional GDP (0.61%) (indicator 4.1.4). On a positive note, clean energy investments in the region increased in 2022, surpassing fossil fuel investments. However, in 2020, all countries reviewed continued to offer net-negative carbon prices, revealing fossil fuel subsidies totalling US$23 billion. Venezuela had the highest net subsidies relative to current health expenditure (123%), followed by Argentina (10.5%), Bolivia (10.3%), Ecuador (8.3%), and Chile (5.6%) (indicator 4.2.1). Fossil fuel-based energy is today more expensive than renewable energy. Fossil fuel burning drives climate change and damages the environment on which people depend, and air pollution derived from the burning of fossil fuels causes seven million premature deaths each year worldwide, along with a substantial burden of disease. Transitioning to sustainable, zero-emission energy sources, fostering healthier food systems, and expediting adaptation efforts promise not only environmental benefits but also significant economic gains. However, to implement mitigation and adaptation policies that also improve social wellbeing and prosperity, stronger and solid financial systems are needed. Climate finance in Latin American countries is scarce and strongly depends on political cycles, which threatens adequate responses to the current and future challenges. Progress on the climate agenda is lagging behind the urgent pace required. While engagement with the intersection of health and climate change is increasing, government involvement remains inadequate. Newspaper coverage of health and climate change has been on the rise, peaking in 2022, yet the proportion of climate change articles discussing health has declined over time (indicator 5.1). Although there has been significant growth in the number of scientific papers focusing on Latin America, it still represents less than 4% of global publications on the subject (indicator 5.3). And, while health was mentioned by most Latin American countries at the UN General Debate in 2022, only a few addressed the intersection of health and climate change, indicating a lack of awareness at the governmental level (indicator 5.4). The 2023 Countdown Latin America report underscores the cascading and compounding health impacts of anthropogenic climate change, marked by increased exposure to heatwaves, wildfires, and vector-borne diseases. Specifically, for Latin America, the report emphasises three critical messages: the urgent action to implement intersectoral public policies that enhance climate resilience across the region; the pressing need to prioritise an energy transition that focuses on health co-benefits and wellbeing, and lastly, that need for increasing climate finance by committing to sustained fiscal efforts and engaging with multilateral development banks. By understanding the problems, addressing the gaps, and taking decisive action, Latin America can navigate the challenges of climate change, fostering a more sustainable and resilient future for its population. Spanish and Portuguese translated versions of this Summary can be found in Appendix B and C, respectively. The full translated report in Spanish is available in Appendix D.
2023年,一系列气候和政治事件相继发生,在推动全球气候与健康议程前进的同时,也凸显了在应对气候相关事件方面存在的重大差距和脆弱性。在政策层面,COP28首次设立健康日,承认气候变化对健康的深远影响,这是向前迈出的重要一步。然而,首次全球盘点显示,当前进展与《巴黎协定》设定的目标之间存在重大差距,凸显了进一步采取果断行动的紧迫性。从拉丁美洲的角度来看,出现了一些问题:我们如何实现所需的变革?如何在一个长期存在社会不平等的地区应对气候变化的脆弱性?我们如何促进跨部门合作,以应对气候变化这样的复杂问题?这场辩论仍在继续,在许多情况下,甚至才刚刚开始。更名后的区域中心“拉丁美洲倒计时”(原名为“南美洲倒计时”)扩大了地理范围,将墨西哥和五个中美洲国家:哥斯达黎加、萨尔瓦多、危地马拉、洪都拉斯和巴拿马纳入其中,以应对在一个社会差距巨大(包括研究能力和资金)的地区加强合作的需求。该中心是一个独立的多学科合作机构,遵循全球《柳叶刀倒计时》的方法和五个领域,追踪拉丁美洲健康与气候变化之间的联系。“拉丁美洲倒计时”的工作依赖于23个区域学术机构、联合国机构以及34名研究人员的承诺,他们慷慨地贡献了自己的时间和专业知识。基于第一份报告,“拉丁美洲倒计时”2023年的报告呈现了34项指标,这些指标追踪了截至2022年健康与气候变化之间的关系,旨在为公共决策提供证据,以便通过关注健康的气候行动来改善拉丁美洲民众的健康和福祉,并减少社会不平等。这份报告显示,拉丁美洲民众持续面临不断变化的气候条件,暴露程度日益增加。整个拉丁美洲所有国家都出现了变暖趋势,产生了严重的直接影响。2022年,人们平均接触的环境温度比1986 - 2005年高出0.38摄氏度;巴拉圭的异常温度最高(+1.9摄氏度),其次是阿根廷(+1.2摄氏度)和乌拉圭(+0.9摄氏度)(指标1.1.)。2013 - 2022年期间,婴儿接触热浪天数比1986 - 2005年增加了248%,65岁以上人群接触热浪天数增加了271%(指标1.1.2)。此外,与1991 - 2000年相比,2013 - 2022年期间,拉丁美洲每人每年因环境高温在轻度户外体育活动中面临至少中度和高度热应激风险增加了256小时和189小时(指标1.1.3)。最后,该地区2000 - 2009年至2013 - 2022年期间与热相关的死亡率上升了140%(指标1.1.4)。生态系统的变化导致野火风险增加,使个人在更长时间内面临极高或极端的火灾危险(指标1.2.1)。此外,从1951 - 1960年到2013 - 2022年,蚊子传播登革热的可能性增加了54%(指标1.3),这与近几个月拉丁美洲各地近期爆发的疫情以及登革热病例增加的情况相符。基于“拉丁美洲倒计时”2023年的报告,拉丁美洲需要进一步探索和推进以健康为中心的气候适应型发展,有三个关键信息。研究结果表明,拉丁美洲的适应政策仍然薄弱,迫切需要进行有力的脆弱性和适应(V&A)评估,以有效应对气候风险。不幸的是,此类评估很少。截至2021年,巴西是唯一完成并向世界卫生组织(WHO)2021年全球调查正式报告V&A的国家。阿根廷、危地马拉和巴拿马也进行了此类评估,但尚未报告(指标2.1.1)。同样,制定和实施国家健康适应计划(HNAP)的努力各不相同,范围有限。巴西、智利和乌拉圭是仅有的拥有HNAP的国家(指标2.1.2)。此外,该地区自我报告的城市层面气候变化风险评估非常有限(指标2.1.3)。气象和卫生部门之间的合作仍然不足,只有阿根廷、巴西、哥伦比亚和危地马拉自我报告了一定程度的整合(指标2.2.1),这阻碍了该地区对与气候相关的健康风险进行全面应对。此外,尽管迫切需要采取行动,但自201年以来该地区城市绿地面积增加进展甚微,只有哥伦比亚、尼加拉瓜和委内瑞拉略有改善(指标2.2.2)。使这些挑战更加复杂的是,拉丁美洲气候变化适应项目的资金减少,2022年绿色气候基金(GCF)分配的资金与2021年相比下降了16%。令人担忧的是,2022年批准的资金中没有一笔用于气候变化与健康项目,凸显了在应对与健康相关的气候风险方面的关键差距(指标2.2.3)。从脆弱性角度来看,蚊子风险指数(MoRI)表明,由于水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)的改善,该地区由蚊子传播的严重疾病风险总体下降(指标2.3.1)。巴西和巴拉圭是仅有的该指标上升的国家。值得注意的是,国家内部和国家之间仍存在显著的时间变化,这表明对与气候相关变化的准备不足。总体而言人口健康不仅仅取决于卫生部门,气候政策也不仅仅是环境部门的责任。需要更多更强有力的跨部门合作,以开辟考虑到对气候变化的坚实适应、大幅减少温室气体排放、增加社会公平和人口健康的发展道路。这些政策涉及金融、交通、能源、住房、卫生和农业等部门,需要允许长期跨部门合作的体制结构和政策工具。在拉丁美洲,能源转型存在显著差异,1991 - 2000年至2011 - 2020年期间,煤炭发电量平均增长2.6%,这对逐步淘汰煤炭的努力构成了挑战(指标3.1.1)。然而,这个百分比增长较为保守,因为它可能没有包括热电发电的所有化石燃料,特别是在与气候相关的事件以及水电受到影响时(专栏4)。然而,可再生能源一直在增长,同期平均增长5.7%。获得清洁烹饪燃料仍然是一个问题,2022年中美洲46.3%的农村人口和南美洲23.3%的农村人口无法获得清洁燃料(指标3.1.2)。必须强调对化石燃料,特别是液化石油气(LPG)作为主要烹饪燃料的过度依赖令人担忧。拉丁美洲绝大多数人口,约74.6%,依赖LPG做饭。转向更清洁的取暖和烹饪替代品也可能通过降低与家庭空气污染相关的死亡率而对健康有益。化石燃料在拉丁美洲的道路运输能源中仍然占主导地位,占96%,尽管一些南美国家正在增加生物燃料的使用(指标3.1.3)。2005年至2020年期间,拉丁美洲因化石燃料衍生的细颗粒物(PM)导致的过早死亡率呈现不同趋势,整个拉丁美洲增加了3.9%,相当于每百万人中有123.5例过早死亡(指标3.2.1)。2020年因PM导致过早死亡率最高的拉丁美洲国家是智利、秘鲁、巴西、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和巴拉圭。2020年因PM导致的过早死亡总数中,19.1%来自交通,12.3%来自家庭,11.6%来自工业,11%来自农业。从温室气体排放和捕获的角度来看,商品驱动的森林砍伐和农业用地扩张仍然是该地区树木覆盖损失的主要原因约占总损失的80%(指标3.3)。此外,拉丁美洲以动物为基础的食品生产占农业二氧化碳当量排放的85%,阿根廷、巴西、巴拿马、巴拉圭和乌拉圭的人均排放量最高(指标3.4.1)。从健康角度来看,2020年,约87万人的死亡与饮食不均衡有关,其中15.5万人(18%)与红肉、加工肉类和乳制品的高摄入量有关(指标3.4.2)。拉丁美洲的能源转型仍处于起步阶段,因此,数百万人目前面临危险水平的空气污染和能源贫困(即无法获得基本能源或服务)。如本报告所示,整个地区的室外和室内空气污染水平都是一个重大问题,城乡之间存在明显差距。2022年,秘鲁、智利、墨西哥、危地马拉、哥伦比亚、萨尔瓦多、巴西、乌拉圭、洪都拉斯、巴拿马和尼加拉瓜位列全球污染最严重的前100个国家之中。转向更清洁的能源、逐步淘汰化石燃料以及提高工业和住房部门的能源效率,不仅是减缓气候变化的措施,也是为更繁荣健康的社会带来巨大健康和经济机遇的途径。气候变化带来了巨大的经济成本,缓解和适应措施的投资进展缓慢。2022年,拉丁美洲因与天气相关的极端事件造成的经济损失为156亿美元,这一数额主要由巴西的洪水和山体滑坡造成,占拉丁美洲国内生产总值(GDP)的0.28%(指标4.1.1)。与高收入国家不同,这些损失大多没有保险覆盖,给受影响的家庭和政府带来了巨大的财政压力。拉丁美洲65岁及以上人群中与热相关的死亡率达到惊人水平,损失超过每年45.1万人的平均收入(指标4.1.2)。此外,因与热相关的劳动能力下降导致的潜在总收入损失达地区GDP的1.34%,对农业和建筑部门的影响尤为严重(指标4.1.3)。此外,空气污染导致的过早死亡造成的经济损失巨大,相当于地区GDP的很大一部分(0.61%)(指标4.1.4)。积极的一面是,2022年该地区的清洁能源投资有所增加,超过了化石燃料投资。然而,2020年,所有接受审查的国家继续提供净负碳价格,显示化石燃料补贴总额达230亿美元。委内瑞拉相对于当前卫生支出的净补贴最高(123%),其次是阿根廷(10.5%)、玻利维亚(10.3%)、厄瓜多尔(8.3%)和智利(5.6%)(指标4.2.1)。如今,基于化石燃料的能源比可再生能源更昂贵。化石燃料燃烧推动气候变化,破坏人们赖以生存的环境,燃烧化石燃料产生的空气污染每年在全球导致700万人过早死亡,并带来巨大的疾病负担。向可持续的零排放能源转型、培育更健康的食品系统以及加快适应努力,不仅有望带来环境效益,还能带来显著的经济收益。然而,要实施既能改善社会福祉又能促进繁荣的缓解和适应政策,需要更强大稳固的金融体系。拉丁美洲国家的气候融资稀缺,且严重依赖政治周期,这威胁到对当前和未来挑战的充分应对。气候议程的进展落后于所需的紧迫步伐。虽然对健康与气候变化交叉领域的参与在增加,但政府的参与仍然不足。报纸对健康与气候变化的报道一直在增加,在2022年达到顶峰,但随着时间的推移,讨论健康的气候变化文章所占比例有所下降(指标5.1)。尽管关注拉丁美洲的科学论文数量有显著增长,但仍占该主题全球出版物的不到4%(指标5.3)。而且,虽然大多数拉丁美洲国家在2022年联合国大会辩论中提到了健康,但只有少数国家涉及健康与气候变化的交叉领域,这表明政府层面缺乏认识(指标5.4)。“拉丁美洲倒计时”2023年的报告强调了人为气候变化对健康的连锁和复合影响,其特点是热浪、野火和媒介传播疾病的暴露增加。具体而言,对于拉丁美洲,该报告强调了三个关键信息:迫切需要采取行动实施跨部门公共政策,以增强整个地区的气候适应能力;迫切需要优先进行以健康共同效益和福祉为重点的能源转型;最后,需要通过持续的财政努力和与多边开发银行合作来增加气候融资。通过了解问题、弥补差距并采取果断行动,拉丁美洲可以应对气候变化的挑战,为其人民培育更可持续、更具韧性的未来。本摘要的西班牙语和葡萄牙语翻译版本分别可在附录B和C中找到。完整的西班牙语翻译报告可在附录D中获取。