Unuvar Bayram Sonmez, Gercek Hasan, Aytar Ayca, Aytar Aydan
Department of Audiology, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Türkiye.
Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Türkiye.
J Chiropr Med. 2024 Sep;23(3):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of single-session Kinesio Tape (KT) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) interventions on pain and proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP).
Forty patients with CNP aged 21 to 44 years were included in this study. The participants were divided into 2 groups as the IASTM and KT groups. The participants in the KT group took part in one session of KT application to the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, while those in the IASTM group took part in one session of IASTM application to the same muscles. The pain levels of the participants during activity were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and their cervical region proprioception levels were assessed using the Cervical Range of Motion device. Pain severity and proprioception were assessed before and after the interventions.
No statistically significant difference was found between the pretreatment pain and proprioception values of the 2 groups ( > .05). After the treatments, there was a significant improvement in proprioception in both groups ( ≤ .001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in VAS values in both groups after the treatments ( ≤ .001). The VAS and proprioception values of the 2 groups were not significantly different in the post-treatment measurements ( > .05).
It was concluded that the IASTM and KT interventions had an immediate effect on pain and proprioception in the participants who had CNP, while neither intervention was superior to the other.
本研究旨在比较单次应用肌内效贴布(KT)和器械辅助软组织松动术(IASTM)对慢性颈痛(CNP)患者疼痛和本体感觉的即时影响。
本研究纳入了40名年龄在21至44岁之间的CNP患者。参与者被分为两组,即IASTM组和KT组。KT组的参与者接受了一次对斜方肌和胸锁乳突肌应用KT的治疗,而IASTM组的参与者接受了一次对相同肌肉应用IASTM的治疗。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录参与者活动期间的疼痛水平,并使用颈椎活动度测量仪评估其颈部区域的本体感觉水平。在干预前后评估疼痛严重程度和本体感觉。
两组治疗前的疼痛和本体感觉值之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(>0.05)。治疗后,两组的本体感觉均有显著改善(≤0.001)。同样,治疗后两组的VAS值也有显著改善(≤0.001)。两组治疗后的VAS和本体感觉值在测量中无显著差异(>0.05)。
得出的结论是,IASTM和KT干预对患有CNP的参与者的疼痛和本体感觉有即时影响,而两种干预方法均不优于另一种。