Rincon Nicole, Gerke Sara, Wagner Jennifer K
Penn State Law, University Park, PA 16802, USA,
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Law, Champaign, IL 61820, USA,
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2025;30:154-166. doi: 10.1142/9789819807024_0012.
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) technologies in healthcare presents significant opportunities for enhancing patient care through innovative diagnostic tools, monitoring systems, and personalized treatment plans. However, these innovative advancements might result in regulatory challenges given recent Supreme Court decisions that impact the authority of regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This paper explores the implications of regulatory uncertainty for the healthcare industry related to balancing innovation in biotechnology and biocomputing with ensuring regulatory uniformity and patient safety. We examine key Supreme Court cases, including Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, and Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and their impact on the Chevron doctrine. We also discuss other relevant cases to highlight shifts in judicial approaches to agency deference and regulatory authority that might affect how science is handled in regulatory spaces, including how biocomputing and other health sciences are governed, how scientific facts are applied in policymaking, and how scientific expertise guides decision making. Through a detailed analysis, we assess the potential impact of regulatory uncertainty in healthcare. Additionally, we provide recommendations for the medical community on navigating these challenges.
人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)技术在医疗保健领域的迅速发展,为通过创新诊断工具、监测系统和个性化治疗方案提升患者护理带来了重大机遇。然而,鉴于最高法院最近的裁决影响了食品药品监督管理局(FDA)等监管机构的权力,这些创新进展可能会引发监管挑战。本文探讨了监管不确定性对医疗行业的影响,涉及在生物技术和生物计算领域的创新与确保监管一致性及患者安全之间取得平衡。我们研究了最高法院的关键案例,包括洛珀·布莱特企业诉雷蒙多案、无情公司诉商务部案以及角柱公司诉联邦储备系统理事会案,以及它们对切夫龙原则的影响。我们还讨论了其他相关案例,以突出司法对机构尊重和监管权力的态度转变,这些转变可能会影响监管领域对科学的处理方式,包括生物计算和其他健康科学如何受到监管、科学事实如何应用于政策制定以及科学专业知识如何指导决策。通过详细分析,我们评估了监管不确定性在医疗保健领域的潜在影响。此外,我们为医学界应对这些挑战提供了建议。