Accuracy of type IV collagen 7S versus Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score for diagnosing fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

BACKGROUND

Various noninvasive tests can be used to identify high-risk groups of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis (MASLD). In this study, we compared the diagnostic performance of serum type 4 collagen 7S (COL4-7S) and the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score for detecting fibrosis in patients with MASLD.

METHODS

Among 1368 patients with MASLD who underwent liver biopsy, 794 with values for both serum COL4-7S and the ELF score were enrolled in this multicenter study. The diagnostic performance of COL4-7S and ELF for detecting fibrosis stage ≥2, fibrosis stage ≥3, and at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis were evaluated using ROC curve, continuous net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement analyses.

RESULTS

Both COL4-7S and ELF scores increased significantly with increasing fibrosis. The AUROC for each outcome was higher for COL4-7S than ELF, but not significantly. The diagnostic performance for detecting fibrosis stage ≥2 was significantly better for COL4-7S than for the ELF score (s net reclassification improvement=16.7%, p=0.018; integrated discrimination improvement=3.9%, p<0.01). In patients without diabetes, the diagnostic performance for each outcome did not differ significantly between COL4-7S and ELF score, but in patients with diabetes, the diagnostic performance for fibrosis stage ≥2 was higher for COL4-7S than for the ELF score (AUROC=0.817 vs. 0.773, p=0.04; s net reclassification improvement=32.7%, p<0.01; integrated discrimination improvement=5.6%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of serum COL4-7S (a single marker) for identifying more advanced disease in patients with MASLD was at least equivalent to that of the ELF score (a combined marker).