Francia Pietro, Viveros Daniel, Gigante Carlo, Falasconi Giulio, Penela Diego, Soto-Iglesias David, Landra Federico, Teresi Lucio, Marti-Almor Julio, Alderete José, Saglietto Andrea, Bellido Aldo Francisco, Turturiello Dario, Valeriano Chiara, Franco-Ocaña Paula, Zaraket Fatima, Matiello Maria, Fernández-Armenta Juan, Antonio Rodolfo San, Berruezo Antonio
Arrhythmia Department, Teknon Heart Institute, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Cardiology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar;68(2):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01968-8. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
Cardioneuroablation (CNA) treats reflex syncope by ablating ganglionated plexi (GPs) either confined to the right (RA) or left atrium (LA), or accessible from both. We assessed whether GP ablation in one atrium affects parasympathetic modulation in the other and how ablation sequence (RA then LA, or vice-versa) impacts efficacy.
Two propensity-matched groups of patients with reflex syncope or functional bradycardia were analyzed. Group 1 received CNA in the RA first, followed by LA. Group 2 in the reverse order.
Thirty-four patients were enrolled. In group 1, RA ablation prompted a heart rate (HR) increase (49.8 ± 10.6 vs. 61.2 ± 13.8 bpm; p < 0.01) that was enhanced after LA ablation (60.3 ± 14.5 vs. 64.5 ± 14.4 bpm; p = 0.02). RA ablation did not reduce PR interval in any patient or modify the Wenckebach point (WP) (596 ± 269 vs. 609 ± 319 ms; p = 0.68), while additional LA ablation reduced PR interval in 3 patients and mean WP (611 ± 317 vs. 482 ± 191 ms; p = 0.03). In group 2, LA ablation increased HR (56.7 ± 6.6 vs. 76.4 ± 13.8 bpm; p < 0.01), with an additional effect of RA ablation (76.0 ± 16.5 vs. 85.4 ± 15.9 bpm; p < 0.01). LA ablation decreased PR interval in 3 patients and mean WP (512 ± 182 vs .399 ± 85 ms; p = 0.01). Further RA ablation did not decrease PR or WP. CNA success was 82% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (p = 0.552). After 24.5 ± 6.1 months, 2 patients in group 1 vs. no patients in group 2 experienced symptom recurrence.
Bi-atrial CNA provides incremental benefits after both RA and LA ablation. Starting ablation in the LA provides the most significant effect on vagal modulation.
心脏神经消融术(CNA)通过消融局限于右心房(RA)或左心房(LA)或双侧均可触及的神经节丛(GPs)来治疗反射性晕厥。我们评估了一侧心房的GP消融是否会影响另一侧的副交感神经调节,以及消融顺序(先RA后LA,或反之)如何影响疗效。
分析了两组倾向匹配的反射性晕厥或功能性心动过缓患者。第1组先在RA进行CNA,然后在LA进行。第2组顺序相反。
共纳入34例患者。在第1组中,RA消融后心率(HR)增加(49.8±10.6对61.2±13.8次/分;p<0.01),LA消融后进一步增加(60.3±14.5对64.5±14.4次/分;p=0.02)。RA消融未使任何患者的PR间期缩短或改变文氏点(WP)(596±269对609±319毫秒;p=0.68),而额外的LA消融使3例患者的PR间期缩短,平均WP降低(611±317对482±191毫秒;p=0.03)。在第2组中,LA消融使HR增加(56.7±6.6对76.4±13.8次/分;p<0.01),RA消融有额外作用(76.0±16.5对85.4±15.9次/分;p<0.01)。LA消融使3例患者的PR间期缩短,平均WP降低(512±182对399±85毫秒;p=0.01)。进一步的RA消融未使PR或WP降低。第1组的CNA成功率为82%,第2组为100%(p=0.552)。在24.5±6.1个月后,第1组有2例患者出现症状复发,第2组无患者复发。
双侧心房CNA在RA和LA消融后均能带来额外益处。从LA开始消融对迷走神经调节的影响最为显著。