Suppr超能文献

与非血流限制对照组相比,运动员下肢血流限制训练在58%的研究中显著改善了与力量相关的结果。

Lower Extremity Blood Flow Restriction Training in Athletes Significantly Improves Strength-Related Outcomes in 58% of Studies Compared to Non-Blood Flow Restriction Control.

作者信息

Tollefson Luke V, Schoenecker Jon, Solie Braidy, Monson Jill, LaPrade Christopher M, Mullin E Patrick, LaPrade Robert F

机构信息

Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Training HAUS, Eagan, Minnesota, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.12.005.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the role of lower extremity blood flow restriction (BFR) in the athletic population.

METHODS

This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. Searches of Level I and II studies were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Article identification was performed in August 2024. Studies related to BFR in the lower extremity in athletic populations were included. The data collected included athlete demographics; treatment groups; BFR training protocols; control training protocol; exercises performed; training duration and frequency; cuff type, size, and pressure; muscles targeted; strength improvement; endurance improvement; muscle growth; and sport-specific metrics (speed, jump height, etc.).

RESULTS

Twenty studies were identified for inclusion. Significant within-group strength increases from pre- to post-training in the BFR group were reported in 19 of 20 studies, with at least 1 strength outcome being significantly increased in the BFR group compared to the control group in 11 of 19 studies (58%). Outcomes related to muscle size were reported in 14 studies, with 10 of these studies reporting within-group increases for the BFR group in at least 1 muscle size metric. Sport-specific metrics were reported in 12 studies, and 4 studies reported on endurance outcomes and generally favored the BFR group over the control group. Five of 6 studies comparing low-load exercise with BFR to high-load exercise without BFR reported comparable outcomes between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we found that 58% of studies reporting on lower extremity BFR use in athletes observed significant strength improvements in the BFR group compared to a non-BFR group. Additionally, when comparing low-intensity exercise with BFR to high-intensity exercise without BFR, 5 of 6 studies reported either improved or comparable outcomes between the BFR and control groups. In general, exercise with and without BFR led to improvements in lower extremity strength, muscle size, endurance outcomes, and sport-specific metrics, and most of the included studies reported greater improvements within the BFR group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

摘要

目的

探讨下肢血流限制(BFR)在运动员群体中的作用。

方法

本研究按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目声明指南进行。在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中检索I级和II级研究。2024年8月进行文献识别。纳入与运动员群体下肢BFR相关的研究。收集的数据包括运动员人口统计学信息;治疗组;BFR训练方案;对照训练方案;进行的运动;训练持续时间和频率;袖带类型、尺寸和压力;目标肌肉;力量提升;耐力提升;肌肉增长;以及特定运动指标(速度、跳跃高度等)。

结果

共识别出20项纳入研究。20项研究中有19项报告了BFR组训练前至训练后组内力量显著增加,19项研究中有11项(58%)报告BFR组至少有1项力量指标相比对照组显著增加。14项研究报告了与肌肉大小相关的结果,其中10项研究报告BFR组至少有1项肌肉大小指标在组内增加。12项研究报告了特定运动指标,4项研究报告了耐力结果,总体上BFR组优于对照组。6项比较低负荷BFR运动与无BFR高负荷运动的研究中有5项报告两组结果相当。

结论

在本系统评价中,我们发现报告运动员使用下肢BFR的研究中有58%观察到BFR组相比非BFR组力量有显著改善。此外,将低强度BFR运动与无BFR高强度运动进行比较时,6项研究中有5项报告BFR组与对照组结果有所改善或相当。总体而言,有BFR和无BFR的运动都能改善下肢力量、肌肉大小、耐力结果和特定运动指标,且大多数纳入研究报告BFR组改善更大。

证据水平

II级,I级和II级研究的系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验