Berey Benjamin L, Mastroleo Nadine R, Pantalone David W, Mayer Kenneth H, Monti Peter M, Kahler Christopher W
Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States of America; Alcohol Research Center on HIV, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States of America; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Binghamton University, Department of Psychology, Binghamton, NY, United States of America.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209599. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209599. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
Disseminating effective alcohol interventions for sexual minority men (SMM) with HIV remains a crucial public health endeavor. Motivational interviewing (MI) interventions are an established approach to reducing alcohol use, yet more research is needed to determine predictors of MI treatment outcomes and underlying mechanisms related to sustained behavior change among SMM with HIV. This pre-registered secondary analysis tested whether action-related stage of change mediated effects of a MI intervention on future alcohol use and problems among SMM with HIV, and whether individual differences in trait optimism moderated these associations.
SMM with HIV who engaged in frequent alcohol use (N = 180) were randomized to MI or assessment-only treatment as usual (TAU). Participants completed a semi-structured Timeline Follow-Back interview to measure past-month alcohol use as well as self-reports assessing stage of change, trait optimism, and alcohol problems at baseline and 3- and 12-months post-baseline.
Structural equation models controlling for baseline alcohol use and stage of change indicated that 3-month action significantly mediated effects of MI on 12-month drinks per week. Likewise, the indirect effect of 3-month action was moderated by higher levels of trait optimism. When employment status, education level, and annual family/household income were included as covariates in the model, being employed significantly predicted 12-month alcohol use, and mediation and moderated mediation effects were no longer statistically significant. Stage of change did not mediate effects of MI on 12-month alcohol problems, and this indirect effect was not moderated by trait optimism.
The present study provides further evidence supporting action-related stage of change as a mechanism linking MI to alcohol use reductions. Results demonstrated that SMM with HIV who were more optimistic tended to take more action towards reducing their alcohol use and suggest that MI-based interventions may benefit from integrating components aimed at augmenting patients' optimism. Yet, covarying for current economic status substantially impacted findings and underscores the need to critically consider how broader socioecological contexts can impact treatment outcomes.
为感染艾滋病毒的性少数男性(SMM)传播有效的酒精干预措施仍然是一项至关重要的公共卫生工作。动机性访谈(MI)干预是减少酒精使用的既定方法,但仍需要更多研究来确定MI治疗结果的预测因素以及与感染艾滋病毒的SMM持续行为改变相关的潜在机制。这项预先注册的二次分析测试了与行动相关的改变阶段是否介导了MI干预对感染艾滋病毒的SMM未来酒精使用和问题的影响,以及特质乐观的个体差异是否调节了这些关联。
经常饮酒的感染艾滋病毒的SMM(N = 180)被随机分配到MI组或仅进行评估的常规治疗(TAU)组。参与者完成了半结构化的时间线追溯访谈,以测量过去一个月的酒精使用情况,并在基线以及基线后3个月和12个月进行自我报告,评估改变阶段、特质乐观和酒精问题。
控制基线酒精使用和改变阶段的结构方程模型表明,3个月时的行动显著介导了MI对12个月每周饮酒量的影响。同样,3个月时行动的间接效应受到较高水平特质乐观的调节。当将就业状况、教育水平和家庭/家庭年收入作为协变量纳入模型时,就业显著预测了12个月的酒精使用,中介和调节中介效应不再具有统计学意义。改变阶段并未介导MI对12个月酒精问题的影响,且这种间接效应未受到特质乐观的调节。
本研究提供了进一步的证据,支持与行动相关的改变阶段作为将MI与减少酒精使用联系起来的一种机制。结果表明,感染艾滋病毒且更乐观的SMM倾向于采取更多行动来减少酒精使用,并表明基于MI的干预措施可能受益于整合旨在增强患者乐观情绪的成分。然而,对当前经济状况进行协变量调整对研究结果产生了重大影响,并强调需要审慎考虑更广泛的社会生态背景如何影响治疗结果。