Yeo Emily N, Young Nathan D, Cleveland Joseph C, Simon Tamara D, Vanderbilt Douglas L, Espinoza Juan, Mirzaian Christine B, Alderete Tanya L
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.
Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
J Pediatr. 2025 Apr;279:114433. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114433. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
To assess how medical complexity and neighborhood opportunity jointly affect cognitive, motor, and language Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Secondary objectives involved identifying the factors contributing to developmental disparities across diverse racial and ethnic groups.
Electronic health records from a Southern California high-risk infant follow-up clinic were analyzed for 440 infants from 2014 through 2023 who had either had neonatal intensive care unit stays, prematurity, very low birth weight, or developmental delay risk. Medical complexity was categorized using the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm into complex chronic (CC), noncomplex chronic, or nonchronic (NC). Neighborhood opportunity was assessed using the Child Opportunity Index 2.0. Developmental progress was tracked from ages 4 to 35.6 months.
Of the cohort, 56% were male, and 67% were born prematurely, with 143 NC, 115 noncomplex chronic, and 182 CC cases. Developmental scores showed a progressive decline with increased medical complexity. Infants who were CC had lower cognitive (β = -15.20, P < .001, 95% CI -18.75, -11.7), motor (β = -20.50, P < .001, 95% CI -24.25, -16.8), and language scores (β = -11.88, P < .001, 95% CI = -15.13 to -8.6) compared with infants who were NC. Lower Child Opportunity Index score was linked with decreased language scores (β = -0.07, P = .005, 95% CI 0.01-0.12) but not cognitive or motor scores.
In high-risk infants, the adverse effects of medical complexities on developmental outcomes exceeded those of prematurity and additionally varied according to child neighborhood opportunity.
评估医疗复杂性和社区机会如何共同影响贝利婴儿发育量表中的认知、运动和语言能力。次要目标包括确定导致不同种族和族裔群体发育差异的因素。
分析了南加州一家高危婴儿随访诊所2014年至2023年期间440名婴儿的电子健康记录,这些婴儿曾入住新生儿重症监护病房、早产、极低出生体重或有发育迟缓风险。使用儿科医疗复杂性算法将医疗复杂性分为复杂慢性(CC)、非复杂慢性或非慢性(NC)。使用儿童机会指数2.0评估社区机会。跟踪了4至35.6个月龄的发育进展。
在该队列中,56%为男性,67%为早产儿,其中143例为NC,115例为非复杂慢性,182例为CC。发育评分显示随着医疗复杂性增加而逐渐下降。与NC组婴儿相比,CC组婴儿的认知(β = -15.20,P <.001,95% CI -18.75,-11.7)、运动(β = -20.50,P <.001,95% CI -24.25,-16.8)和语言评分(β = -11.88,P <.001,95% CI = -15.13至-8.6)更低。儿童机会指数得分较低与语言评分降低相关(β = -0.07,P =.005,95% CI 0.01 - 0.12),但与认知或运动评分无关。
在高危婴儿中,医疗复杂性对发育结果的不利影响超过了早产,并且还因儿童社区机会而异。