Kim Nalee, Kim Su Ssan, Cho Won Kyung, Park Won, Chang Ji Hyun, Kim Yong Bae, Chang Ah Ram, Kim Tae Hyun, Park Jongmoo, Kim Jin Hee, Kim Kyubo, Lim Yu Jin, Kim Tae Gyu, Choi Jin Hwa, Kwon Jeanny, Kim Sungmin, Shin Kyung Hwan, Kim Haeyoung
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 May 1;122(1):72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.109. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
Given the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adjuvant capecitabine has been the standard therapy for residual disease after preoperative systemic therapy (PST). However, the optimal sequence of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) and capecitabine remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concurrent RT and capecitabine (RT+CAP) versus sequential RT followed by capecitabine (RT→CAP) in patients with residual TNBC after PST.
In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 491 patients treated at 14 tertiary hospitals were analyzed. The patients received either postoperative RT→CAP (n = 255) or RT+CAP (n = 236). Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.
There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the 4-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.8% and 82.4%, respectively. The RT+CAP group demonstrated improvements in DFS (74.6% vs 63.7%, P = .045) and OS (86.8% vs 78.3%, P = .006) compared with the RT→CAP group. Specifically, RT+CAP showed superior DFS and OS outcomes in patients with a low disease burden (ypT0-1, ypN0/axillar level I only, or Ki67 <15%). Additionally, the incidence of ≥grade 2 toxicities and discontinuation of capecitabine because of toxicity did not differ, indicating that RT+CAP was well tolerated.
RT+CAP offers improvements in oncologic outcomes without an increase in adverse events compared with RT→CAP, suggesting it is a promising treatment option for patients with residual TNBC after PST.
鉴于三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)侵袭性强且预后较差,术前全身治疗(PST)后残留疾病的辅助性卡培他滨一直是标准治疗方法。然而,术后放疗(RT)和卡培他滨的最佳顺序仍不明确。本研究评估了PST后残留TNBC患者同步放疗和卡培他滨(RT+CAP)与序贯放疗后使用卡培他滨(RT→CAP)的疗效和安全性。
在这项多中心回顾性研究中,分析了14家三级医院治疗的491例患者的数据。患者接受术后RT→CAP(n = 255)或RT+CAP(n = 236)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存结果,并使用多变量Cox回归调整潜在混杂因素。
两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。中位随访41.8个月,4年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为68.8%和82.4%。与RT→CAP组相比,RT+CAP组在DFS(74.6%对63.7%,P = 0.045)和OS(86.8%对78.3%,P = 0.006)方面有改善。具体而言,RT+CAP在疾病负担低(ypT0-1、仅ypN0/腋窝I级或Ki67<15%)的患者中显示出更好的DFS和OS结果。此外,≥2级毒性的发生率以及因毒性而停用卡培他滨的情况并无差异,表明RT+CAP耐受性良好。
与RT→CAP相比,RT+CAP在不增加不良事件的情况下改善了肿瘤学结局,表明它是PST后残留TNBC患者的一种有前景的治疗选择。