O'Meara S, Cunnane E M, McCarthy C M, Croghan S M, Mulvhill J J E, Walsh M T, O'Brien F J, Davis N F
Strategic Academic Recruitment (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Urology, Blackrock Health, Blackrock, Dublin, Ireland.
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 14;43(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05397-0.
Buccal mucosal grafts have a well-established role in urology regarding the management of ureteric stricture disease. Despite its established use as a graft material there is a lack of data on the mechanical properties of buccal mucosa. We aim to compare the passive mechanical properties of porcine buccal mucosa with the ureter.
Buccal mucosa (n = 20) and ureteric specimens (n = 21) were harvested from 19 domestic pigs at the time of euthanasia. Mechanical testing was performed using a uniaxial tensometer to generate stress-strain curves. From these curves, ultimate tensile strength and elastic modulus were calculated. Data was analysed, and one-way ANOVA testing was used to assess for significance variation in mechanical response due to direction of testing, and between tissue types.
Porcine ureteric specimens displayed mechanical anisotropy, with a significant difference in the elastic modulus depending on the direction of testing (p = 0.005), and a higher mean ultimate tensile strength in the longitudinal (498.09 kPa) compared to the transverse (263.99 kPa) direction (p = 0.0005). Buccal mucosa was isotropic with no significant difference in elastic modulus or ultimate tensile strength according to direction of testing. Comparison of tissue types showed a significantly greater mean ultimate tensile strength in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.002) in ureter compared to buccal mucosa. We present the first comparison of the mechanical properties of buccal mucosa with ureter, and demonstrate significant variation in elastic modulus and ultimate tensile strength between the tissue types. These findings have important clinical implications for physiological function and in the design of alternative approaches for reconstruction in buccal mucosa grafted ureters.
颊黏膜移植物在泌尿外科治疗输尿管狭窄疾病方面具有公认的作用。尽管其作为移植物材料已被广泛应用,但关于颊黏膜力学性能的数据却很缺乏。我们旨在比较猪颊黏膜与输尿管的被动力学性能。
在19头家猪安乐死时采集颊黏膜样本(n = 20)和输尿管样本(n = 21)。使用单轴拉伸仪进行力学测试以生成应力-应变曲线。根据这些曲线计算极限抗拉强度和弹性模量。对数据进行分析,并使用单因素方差分析来评估由于测试方向以及组织类型之间力学响应的显著差异。
猪输尿管样本表现出力学各向异性,弹性模量根据测试方向有显著差异(p = 0.005),纵向(498.09 kPa)的平均极限抗拉强度高于横向(263.99 kPa)(p = 0.0005)。颊黏膜呈各向同性,根据测试方向弹性模量或极限抗拉强度无显著差异。组织类型比较显示,输尿管纵向的平均极限抗拉强度显著高于颊黏膜(p = 0.002)。我们首次比较了颊黏膜与输尿管的力学性能,并证明了组织类型之间弹性模量和极限抗拉强度存在显著差异。这些发现对生理功能以及颊黏膜移植输尿管重建替代方法的设计具有重要的临床意义。