Li Yang, Li Yangzhi, Wang Yong, Hou Minzhi, Yan Xing, Chen Dongmei, Chen Yaxiao, Xie Meiqing
The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medicine University, Guangdong, China.
The Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong, 510080, China.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Apr;311(4):1063-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
To investigate pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility.
Retrospective cohort study.
University-affiliated hospital.
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, finally, a total of 461 subjects were included.
HA performed using either an electrosurgical instrument or hysteroscopic scissors.
Pregnancy outcomes post-HA.
A total of 461 patients were included in the study, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 6 years. The mean age was 29.48 ± 3.25 years. Hysteroscopic scissors demonstrated greater efficiency in restoring the uterine cavity compared to electrosurgical instruments (88.1% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.025). Post-HA, the pregnancy rate was approximately 75.3% (347/461), with a live birth rate of 55.9% (251/449). No significant differences were found between the electrosurgical instrument and hysteroscopic scissors groups regarding improvements in menstrual flow or fertility outcomes (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier time-dependent cumulative curves for pregnancy and live birth rates after HA indicated that over 50% of patients achieved pregnancy within one year, with the pregnancy rate plateauing at 2 years and the live birth rate at 3 years.
Our findings suggest that HA can improve fertility outcomes for patients with RPL or infertility within 2 to 3 years following surgery. Hysteroscopic scissors proved more effective than electrosurgical instruments in restoring the uterine cavity, although no differences were observed between the techniques in terms of menstrual flow or fertility improvements. All in all, our study suggests that standardized HA procedures, the implementation of proactive intraoperative and postoperative measures to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA), and an active conception plan following HA are key factors in improving reproductive outcomes for these patients with RPL or infertility.
探讨复发性流产(RPL)或不孕症患者宫腔镜粘连松解术(HA)后的妊娠结局。
回顾性队列研究。
大学附属医院。
根据本研究的纳入和排除标准,最终共纳入461名研究对象。
使用电外科器械或宫腔镜剪刀进行HA。
HA术后的妊娠结局。
本研究共纳入461例患者,随访时间为1至6年。平均年龄为29.48±3.25岁。与电外科器械相比,宫腔镜剪刀在恢复子宫腔方面显示出更高的效率(88.1%对80.0%,p = 0.025)。HA术后,妊娠率约为75.3%(347/461),活产率为55.9%(251/449)。在改善月经流量或生育结局方面,电外科器械组和宫腔镜剪刀组之间未发现显著差异(所有p>0.05)。HA术后妊娠率和活产率的Kaplan-Meier时间依赖性累积曲线表明,超过50%的患者在1年内实现妊娠,妊娠率在2年时趋于平稳,活产率在3年时趋于平稳。
我们的研究结果表明,HA可在术后2至3年内改善RPL或不孕症患者的生育结局。宫腔镜剪刀在恢复子宫腔方面比电外科器械更有效,尽管在月经流量或生育改善方面两种技术之间未观察到差异。总而言之,我们的研究表明,标准化的HA程序、实施积极的术中及术后措施以预防宫腔粘连(IUA)复发以及HA后的积极受孕计划是改善这些RPL或不孕症患者生殖结局的关键因素。