Montégut Coline, Falandry Claire, Cinieri Saverio, Cropet Claire, Montane Laure, Rousseau Frédérique, Joly Florence, Moubarak Malak, Mosconi Anna M, Guerra-Alía Eva M, Schauer Christian, Fujiwara Hiroyuki, Vergote Ignace, Parma Gabriella, Lindahl Gabriel, Anota Amélie, Canzler Ulrich, Marmé Frederik, Pujade-Lauraine Eric, Ray-Coquard Isabelle, Sabatier Renaud
Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
GINECO, France.
Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae322.
In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.
Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.
Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).
Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).
在PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25研究中,在贝伐单抗维持治疗基础上加用奥拉帕利可改善新诊断的晚期卵巢癌患者的总生存期。我们描述了PAOLA-1研究中该联合方案在老年患者中的安全性和生活质量(QoL)。
收集安全性(CTCAE v4.03)和QoL(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QoL问卷核心30项和卵巢癌28项)数据。我们比较了含奥拉帕利组中不同年龄(≥70岁与<70岁)患者的安全性。对老年患者按治疗组评估QoL。还收集了包括老年脆弱性评分(GVS)在内的老年特征。
在806例随机分组的患者中,142例年龄≥70岁(含奥拉帕利组:n = 104;安慰剂组:n = 38)。接受奥拉帕利治疗的老年患者与年轻患者的安全性特征相似,但所有级别的淋巴细胞减少症和≥3级高血压的发生率较高(分别为31.7%对21.6%,P = 0.032;26.9%对16.7%,P = 0.019)。未报告血液系统恶性肿瘤。随机分组两年后,奥拉帕利组的平均总体健康状况和认知功能似乎比单独使用贝伐单抗更好(调整后平均差异:分别为+4.47分[95%CI,-0.49至9.42]和+4.82[-0.57至10.21]),且两组间其他QoL项目相似。在含奥拉帕利组中,基线GVS≥1的老年患者(n = 48)比GVS为0的患者(n = 34)毒性增加且QoL更差。
在PAOLA-1研究的老年患者中,奥拉帕利加贝伐单抗具有可控的安全性,且对QoL无不良影响。需要更多数据来在更脆弱的患者中证实这些结果。(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02477644)