Almizel Abdulrahman M, Levett Jeremy Y, Zolotarova Tetiana, Eisenberg Mark J
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 15;239:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.013. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently present with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and the optimal timing of complete revascularization (CR) in these cases remains uncertain. This study aims to assess major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and procedural complications in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD who underwent immediate (index procedure) versus staged CR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged CR in STEMI and multivessel CAD. Trials were identified by way of a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Libraries from database inception to March 6, 2024. The data were analyzed using the RevMan software. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,415) were included in our study, which showed no significant differences in MACEs (13.3% vs 9.8%, relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.83), all-cause mortality (3% vs 4.55%, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.21), or myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 2.6%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.55) at a weighted mean follow-up duration of 16 months. However, the staged group had a higher rate of unplanned revascularization (8.6% vs 4.4%, RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.04). In conclusion, in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD, at a mean follow-up of approximately 1.3 years, there is no significant difference in immediate versus staged revascularization (SR) for MACEs; however, SR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. SR within the index hospitalization may be as effective as immediate CR; further trials are needed to confirm this. Condensed Abstract We conducted a meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction rates between immediate and staged complete revascularization. However, staged revascularization was associated with a higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,常伴有多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD),而在这些病例中完全血运重建(CR)的最佳时机仍不确定。本研究旨在评估接受即刻(首次手术)与分期CR的多支血管CAD的STEMI患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和手术并发症。我们对比较STEMI和多支血管CAD患者即刻与分期CR的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。通过对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆从建库至2024年3月6日进行系统检索来识别试验。使用RevMan软件分析数据。我们的研究共纳入5项随机对照试验(n = 1415),结果显示,在加权平均随访16个月时,MACE(13.3%对9.8%,相对风险[RR] 1.07,95%置信区间[CI] 0.62至1.83)、全因死亡率(3%对4.55%,RR 0.70,95% CI 0.41至1.21)或心肌梗死(4.5%对2.6%,RR 1.43,95% CI 0.58至3.55)方面无显著差异。然而,分期组的非计划血运重建率较高(8.6%对4.4%,RR 1.92,95% CI 1.21至3.04)。总之,对于多支血管CAD的STEMI患者,在平均随访约1.3年时,即刻与分期血运重建(SR)在MACE方面无显著差异;然而,SR与非计划缺血驱动的血运重建发生率显著较高相关。首次住院期间的SR可能与即刻CR一样有效;需要进一步试验来证实这一点。摘要缩写我们对5项随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,比较ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的即刻与分期完全血运重建。即刻与分期完全血运重建在主要不良心血管事件、全因死亡率和心肌梗死发生率方面无显著差异。然而,分期血运重建与非计划缺血驱动的血运重建发生率较高相关。