Suppr超能文献

立体定向消融放疗(SABR)/立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)治疗Ⅰ期高危非小细胞肺癌患者的系统评价

Systematic Review of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)/Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Wolf Andrea, Loo Billy W, Mak Raymond H, Liptay Michael, Pettiford Brian, Rocco Gaetano, Lanuti Michael, Merritt Robert E, Keshavarz Homa, Suh Robert D, Brunelli Alessandro, Criner Gerard J, Mazzone Peter J, Walsh Garrett, Wafford Q Eileen, Murthy Sudish, Marshall M Blair, Tong Betty, Luketich James, Schuchert Matthew J, Varghese Thomas K, D'Amico Thomas A, Pennathur Arjun, Swanson Scott J

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.

Department of Radiation Oncology & Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Spring;37(1):89-98. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

Abstract

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an alternative, non-surgical treatment for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased use over time. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) assembled an expert panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature evaluating the results of SABR, which is also referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), prior to developing treatment recommendations for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC based on expert consensus. Publications detailing the findings of 16 prospective studies of SABR and 14 retrospective studies of SABR for the management of early-stage lung cancer in 54,697 patients were identified by systematic review of the literature with further review by members of our expert panel. Medical inoperability (93-95%) was the primary reason for utilizing SABR. The median rate of histologically confirmed cancer in treated patients was 67% (range 57-86%). In retrospective studies and prospective studies, the most common dosing regimens were 48-54Gy in 3-5 fractions and 44-66Gy in 3-5 fractions respectively. The median follow-up after SABR was 30 months (range 15-50). The complications, oncological results and quality of life after SABR in high-risk patients with early-stage NSCLC are summarized in this Expert Review article. Further prospective randomized trials are needed and are currently underway to compare outcomes after SABR with outcomes after sublobar resection to fully evaluate treatment options applicable this high-risk group of patients.

摘要

立体定向消融放疗(SABR)已成为治疗高危Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一种非手术替代疗法,且随着时间推移其应用越来越多。美国胸外科协会(AATS)临床实践标准委员会(CPSC)组建了一个专家小组,并对评估SABR(也称为立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)或立体定向放射外科(SRS))结果的文献进行了系统回顾,以便在基于专家共识为高危Ⅰ期NSCLC患者制定治疗建议之前进行参考。通过对文献的系统回顾并经我们专家小组的成员进一步审查,确定了16项关于SABR治疗早期肺癌的前瞻性研究和14项回顾性研究的详细结果,这些研究涉及54,697例患者。医学上无法手术(93 - 95%)是采用SABR的主要原因。经组织学确诊的癌症患者的中位比例为67%(范围57 - 86%)。在回顾性研究和前瞻性研究中,最常见的给药方案分别是3 - 5次分割给予48 - 54Gy和3 - 5次分割给予44 - 66Gy。SABR后的中位随访时间为30个月(范围15 - 50个月)。这篇专家综述文章总结了高危早期NSCLC患者接受SABR后的并发症、肿瘤学结果和生活质量。还需要进一步的前瞻性随机试验,目前正在进行中,以比较SABR与肺叶下切除术后的结果,从而全面评估适用于这一高危患者群体的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验