Suppr超能文献

一线阿替利珠单抗和贝伐单抗治疗后晚期肝细胞癌的二线治疗:多中心单机构队列经验

Second-line therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab: multicenter single institution cohort experience.

作者信息

Marell Paulina, Kournoutas Ioannis, Gile Jennifer, Peersen Anina, Shah Priyanshi, Babiker Hani, Kankeu Lionel Fonkoua, Washburn Leslie, Graham Rondell, Truty Mark, Starlinger Patrick, Halfdanarson Thorvardur, Jin Zhaohui, Jatoi Aminah, McWilliams Robert, Borad Mitesh, Bekaii-Saab Tanios S, Mahipal Amit, Ou Fang-Shu, Tran Nguyen H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2024 Dec 14. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae342.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

摘要

背景

阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗(A/B)于2020年获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,作为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一线治疗方案。然而,最佳的后续治疗选择尚不清楚。在此,我们描述了晚期HCC患者接受A/B一线治疗后的临床结局。

患者与方法

我们对2018年1月至2022年12月在梅奥诊所接受A/B一线治疗的HCC患者进行了多中心分析。该研究队列包括所有接受A/B治疗后接受二线全身治疗的患者。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计中位总生存期(OS)和治疗中断时间(TTD)。还描述了诊断时、一线治疗前和二线治疗前的Child Pugh(CP)评分。

结果

在接受A/B治疗的342例患者中,107例(31.3%)接受了二线治疗,包括抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗或免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI),并纳入最终分析。所有患者从二线治疗开始的中位OS为11.1个月。接受抗VEGF抑制剂和ICI的患者中位OS分别为10.7个月(95%CI:7.2-12.8)和15.7个月(95%CI:6.8-未达到)(P = 0.50)。抗VEGF抑制剂和ICI二线治疗的中位TTD分别为2.4个月(95%CI:1.7-3.3)和2.6个月(95%CI:1.5-5.1)(P = 0.87)。在多变量分析中,CP与生存率显著相关。

结论

一线A/B治疗后,ICI和抗VEGF治疗在生存率或治疗中断时间方面无统计学显著差异。CP评分仍然是一个重要的预后工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验