Buckner Petty Skye A, Raynor Gwendolyn, Verdiner Ricardo, Stephens Elizabeth H, Oboh Osezele, Williams Tiffany, Shore-Lesserson Linda, Milam Adam J
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic; Phoenix, AZ.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Feb;39(2):414-419. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.11.019. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
To evaluate whether the addition of ketamine to intraoperative methadone is associated with superior postoperative pain management and decreased opioid consumption compared with methadone alone in cardiac surgery patients.
A retrospective cohort study.
A large academic medical system comprising four sites.
A total of 6,856 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and received intraoperative methadone between 2018 and 2023 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received both methadone and ketamine (Group M+K; n = 5,696) and those who received methadone alone (Group M; n = 1,160).
Intraoperative administration of methadone with or without ketamine. Some patients also received additional opioids such as hydromorphone and fentanyl.
The primary outcomes were daily total oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) until postoperative day (POD) 7 and the time to first postoperative opioid administration. The secondary outcome was daily postoperative pain scores until POD 7. Exploratory outcomes included delirium and intensive care unit length of stay. The median time to first postoperative opioid administration was longer in Group M+K (7.2 hours) compared with Group M (5.0 hours) (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval: [0.82, 0.95]). Total OMEs were significantly lower in Group M+K on POD 0 (ß = -2.24; 95% confidence interval: [-3.2, -1.3]), with no significant differences beyond POD 0. No significant differences were found in pain scores or exploratory outcomes.
Adding ketamine to methadone prolonged the time to first opioid consumption postoperatively but showed no benefits beyond POD 0. Future studies should consider protocolized dosing to optimize pain control.
评估在心脏手术患者中,与单独使用美沙酮相比,术中加用氯胺酮是否与更好的术后疼痛管理及减少阿片类药物用量相关。
一项回顾性队列研究。
一个由四个地点组成的大型学术医疗系统。
纳入2018年至2023年间接受体外循环心脏手术并术中使用美沙酮的6856例患者。患者分为两组:接受美沙酮和氯胺酮的患者(美沙酮+氯胺酮组;n = 5696)和仅接受美沙酮的患者(美沙酮组;n = 1160)。
术中给予美沙酮,可加用或不加用氯胺酮。一些患者还接受了其他阿片类药物,如氢吗啡酮和芬太尼。
主要结局为术后第7天每日口服吗啡当量(OME)总量及首次术后使用阿片类药物的时间。次要结局为术后第7天每日术后疼痛评分。探索性结局包括谵妄和重症监护病房住院时间。美沙酮+氯胺酮组首次术后使用阿片类药物的中位时间(7.2小时)长于美沙酮组(5.0小时)(风险比 = 0.88,95%置信区间:[0.82, 0.95])。术后第0天美沙酮+氯胺酮组的OME总量显著更低(β = -2.24;95%置信区间:[-3.2, -1.3]),术后第0天之后无显著差异。疼痛评分或探索性结局未发现显著差异。
美沙酮加用氯胺酮可延长术后首次使用阿片类药物的时间,但术后第0天之后无益处。未来研究应考虑采用标准化给药方案以优化疼痛控制。