Unlu Yigit, Piaggi Paolo, Stinson Emma J, De Baca Tomás Cabeza, Rodzevik Theresa L, Walter Mary, Fry Hannah, Krakoff Jonathan, Chang Douglas C
Obesity and Diabetes Clinical Research Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Obesity and Diabetes Clinical Research Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ, United States; Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Feb;121(2):293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.013. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
Measures of energy metabolism (energy expenditure [EE], respiratory exchange ratio [RER]) have been associated with ad libitum energy intake (EI) and weight gain in previous observational studies, suggesting that energy-sensing mechanisms drive EI to meet metabolic energy demands.
We aimed to employ mild cold exposure as an intervention to alter energy metabolism and evaluate its causal effects on concurrent and next day ad libitum EI.
In a controlled crossover study, 47 volunteers (16 female; age 37.2 ± 10.7 y; body mass index 32.4 ± 8.6 kg/m) completed four 24-h EE measurements in a respiratory chamber. Participants ate ad libitum for 24-h using an objective vending machine paradigm while in the chamber during both cold exposure (19°C) and thermoneutral conditions (23.5°C) and after 2 eucaloric chamber stays with exposure to each temperature. Energy metabolism changes were calculated from eucaloric conditions (cold compared with thermoneutral).
Compared with thermoneutral conditions, participants consumed 13% more while residing in the chamber during cold (mean difference: 411 ± 987 kcal/d, P = 0.006), but not the day after cold exposure. Neither eucaloric EE, RER, nor carbohydrate oxidation (CARBOX) was significantly changed by cold exposure. However, greater increases in RER and CARBOX during cold exposure were associated with greater ad libitum EI on the day after cold exposure (r = 0.29, P = 0.049 and r = 0.33, P = 0.02), but not with EI during cold exposure. Cold-induced changes in 24-h EE were not associated with changes in ad libitum EI during or after cold exposure.
Ad libitum EI increased during but not after mild cold exposure. There was an effect of 24-h RER and CARBOX during cold exposure that was related to greater ad libitum EI after cold. These results indicate an acute effect of cold on concurrent EI independent of changes in metabolic rate, but also a residual influence of cold on subsequent EI via fuel preference. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02939404.
在以往的观察性研究中,能量代谢指标(能量消耗[EE]、呼吸交换率[RER])与随意能量摄入(EI)和体重增加有关,这表明能量感知机制驱动EI以满足代谢能量需求。
我们旨在采用轻度冷暴露作为干预措施来改变能量代谢,并评估其对同时期及次日随意EI的因果效应。
在一项对照交叉研究中,47名志愿者(16名女性;年龄37.2±10.7岁;体重指数32.4±8.6kg/m²)在呼吸室内完成了4次24小时的EE测量。参与者在呼吸室内,在冷暴露(19°C)和热中性条件(23.5°C)下以及在每种温度下进行2次等热量的室内停留后,使用客观自动售货机模式随意进食24小时。能量代谢变化根据等热量条件(冷暴露与热中性条件相比)计算得出。
与热中性条件相比,参与者在冷暴露期间在呼吸室内的摄入量增加了13%(平均差异:411±987千卡/天,P=0.006),但在冷暴露后的第二天没有增加。冷暴露并未显著改变等热量的EE、RER或碳水化合物氧化(CARBOX)。然而,冷暴露期间RER和CARBOX的更大增加与冷暴露后第二天更大的随意EI相关(r=0.29,P=0.049;r=0.33,P=0.02),但与冷暴露期间的EI无关。冷诱导的24小时EE变化与冷暴露期间或之后随意EI的变化无关。
轻度冷暴露期间随意EI增加,但暴露后未增加。冷暴露期间24小时RER和CARBOX的变化与冷暴露后更大的随意EI有关。这些结果表明冷对同时期EI有急性影响,与代谢率变化无关,但冷通过燃料偏好对后续EI也有残留影响。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02939404。