Knudsen Ane-Kersti Skaarup, Randrup Tina Hovgaard, Kesmodel Ulrik Schiøler, Booth Berit, Gustafson Line, Tropé Ameli, Strander Björn, Nieminen Pekka, Hammer Anne
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning 7400, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e085382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085382.
Colposcopy is a standard procedure for evaluating cervical abnormalities and collecting cervical biopsies. The procedure is associated with intra- and inter-observer variation. A colposcopic scoring system, Swedescore, has been designed to standardise and facilitate colposcopy training. Swedescore has performed well in a routine clinical setting when used by expert colposcopists to find or exclude high-grade lesions. Danish clinical guidelines for colposcopy differ from other countries, as they recommend collecting four cervical biopsies in all women regardless of risk factors or colposcopy findings. Swedescore has never been examined to assess the reduction of cervical biopsies in a real-world clinical setting. This study aims to investigate whether the implementation of Swedescore can optimise the diagnostic work-up for whom the collection of biopsies can be safely omitted or reduced.
The design is a clinical multicentre non-randomised intervention study in Denmark. According to a power calculation, we will need to include 586 women referred for colposcopy. Colposcopy with Swedescore will be compared with conventional colposcopy with no Swedescore. Cervical biopsies will be divided into two separate vials (target and random biopsies). The primary outcome will be normal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 detected in cervical biopsies. χ and logistic regression will be used to compare estimates between arms.
The study protocol has been submitted to the Ethical Committee in Central Denmark region and is not notifiable to the Committee (j.no.: 1-10-72-124-22). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific meetings.
NCT05870787.
Version 3 (date 12. November 2024).
阴道镜检查是评估宫颈异常情况和采集宫颈活检组织的标准程序。该程序存在观察者内和观察者间的差异。一种阴道镜评分系统,即瑞典评分(Swedescore),已被设计用于规范和促进阴道镜检查培训。当由专业阴道镜检查医师在常规临床环境中使用时,瑞典评分在发现或排除高级别病变方面表现良好。丹麦的阴道镜临床指南与其他国家不同,因为它们建议对所有女性都采集四份宫颈活检组织,无论其风险因素或阴道镜检查结果如何。瑞典评分从未在实际临床环境中进行过评估,以确定其能否减少宫颈活检组织的采集。本研究旨在调查实施瑞典评分是否可以优化诊断流程,从而安全地省略或减少那些无需采集活检组织的患者的检查。
本研究设计为丹麦的一项临床多中心非随机干预研究。根据样本量计算,我们将需要纳入586名接受阴道镜检查的女性。将使用瑞典评分的阴道镜检查与不使用瑞典评分的传统阴道镜检查进行比较。宫颈活检组织将被分为两个单独的样本瓶(目标活检和随机活检)。主要结局将是宫颈活检组织中检测到的正常情况或1级宫颈上皮内瘤变。将使用卡方检验和逻辑回归来比较两组之间的评估结果。
研究方案已提交给丹麦中部地区伦理委员会,且无需该委员会批准(编号:1-10-72-124-22)。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在科学会议上展示。
NCT05870787。
第3版(日期:2024年11月12日)。