• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性糖尿病足:糖尿病足感染手术后的裂开发生率及危险因素。

The infected diabetic foot: Incidence and risk factors for dehiscence after surgery for diabetic foot infections.

作者信息

Lavery Lawrence A, Reyes Mario C, Najafi Bijan, Coye Tyler L, Chung Jayer, Siah Michael C, Tarricone Arthur N

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2025 Jan-Feb;33(1):e13235. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13235.

DOI:10.1111/wrr.13235
PMID:39676270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11647064/
Abstract

Our objective was to assess the incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of dehiscence after foot surgery in diabetic patients. We used pooled patient-level data from two randomised clinical trials with 240 diabetic patients who required foot surgery for infections. Most patients (n = 180, 75.0%) had surgical wound closure. We defined dehisced surgical wounds (DSW) when the surgical site was not completely epithelialized with no drainage after sutures/staples were removed with a 2-week validation of healing. We evaluated the time to heal, re-infection, re-ulceration, hospital admissions and amputations. Moderate and severe infection was based on criteria of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. We used χ and t-test and Mann-Whitney U for comparison of clinical events, with α of <0.05. DSW occurred in 137 (76.1%) patients. DSW patients were more likely to have hypertension (62.8% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.01), high ESR (59.1 ± 37.9 vs. 75.9 ± 37.6, p = 0.01), low toe brachial indices (0.8 ± 0.2) (0.7 ± 0.2, p = 0.005), toe brachial indices <0.6 (16.7% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.008), and low skin perfusion pressure measurements (dorsal medial 71.0 ± 29.4 vs. 59.3 ± 23.3, p = 0.01, and plantar medial 81.8 ± 24.9 vs. 72.2 ± 20.4, p = 0.02). During 12-month follow-up, DSW patients were 12.9 times more likely to have re-infection (0% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.02) and 6.8 times more likely to require amputation (2.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.04). The median healing time (28, 22.5-35.0 vs. 114.0, 69.0; 365, p = 0.001), and median length of hospitalisation were longer in DSW patients (12.0, 9.01-9.0 vs. 15.0, 11.0-24.0, p = 0.04). There was a high incidence of DSW, associated with poor clinical outcomes.

摘要

我们的目标是评估糖尿病患者足部手术后伤口裂开的发生率、危险因素及临床结局。我们使用了两项随机临床试验中240例因感染需要足部手术的糖尿病患者的汇总个体水平数据。大多数患者(n = 180,75.0%)进行了手术伤口缝合。我们将手术伤口裂开(DSW)定义为在缝线/吻合钉拆除后手术部位未完全上皮化且无引流,愈合情况经2周验证。我们评估了愈合时间、再次感染、再次溃疡、住院情况和截肢情况。中度和重度感染依据糖尿病足国际工作组的标准判定。我们使用χ检验、t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验来比较临床事件,α值<0.05。137例(76.1%)患者发生了DSW。DSW患者更易患高血压(62.8%对81.8%,p = 0.01)、血沉(ESR)升高(59.1±37.9对75.9±37.6,p = 0.01)、趾臂指数较低(0.8±0.2对0.7±0.2,p = 0.005)、趾臂指数<0.6(16.7%对40.9%,p = 0.008)以及皮肤灌注压测量值较低(内侧背侧71.0±29.4对59.3±23.3,p = 0.01,内侧足底81.8±24.9对72.2±20.4,p = 0.02)。在12个月的随访期间,DSW患者再次感染的可能性高12.9倍(0%对12.4%,p = 0.02),需要截肢的可能性高6.8倍(2.3%对13.9%,p = 0.04)。DSW患者的中位愈合时间(28天,22.5 - 35.0天对114.0天,69.0 - 365天,p = 0.001)和中位住院时间更长(12.0天,9.01 - 9.0天对15.0天,11.0 - 24.0天,p = 0.04)。DSW的发生率很高,且与不良临床结局相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/11647064/8c05857d9363/WRR-33-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/11647064/8c05857d9363/WRR-33-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc12/11647064/8c05857d9363/WRR-33-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The infected diabetic foot: Incidence and risk factors for dehiscence after surgery for diabetic foot infections.感染性糖尿病足:糖尿病足感染手术后的裂开发生率及危险因素。
Wound Repair Regen. 2025 Jan-Feb;33(1):e13235. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13235.
2
The infected diabetic foot: Risk factors for re-infection after treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis.感染性糖尿病足:糖尿病足骨髓炎治疗后再次感染的危险因素
Wound Repair Regen. 2025 Jan-Feb;33(1):e13246. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13246.
3
MRSA infection, re-infection and clinical outcomes in diabetic foot infections.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染、再感染与糖尿病足感染的临床转归。
Wound Repair Regen. 2024 Jul-Aug;32(4):377-383. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13164. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
The infected diabetic foot: Analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections.感染性糖尿病足:糖尿病与非糖尿病足感染的分析。
Wound Repair Regen. 2024 Jul-Aug;32(4):360-365. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13162. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
5
Comparison of surgical wound infection and dehiscence following the use of two methods of nylon sutures and skin staples in staples in diabetic mellitus patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery: a randomized clinical trial study.两种尼龙缝合线和皮肤吻合钉在糖尿病患者全膝关节置换手术中使用后手术伤口感染和裂开情况的比较:一项随机临床试验研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08263-7.
6
Poorly designed research does not help clarify the role of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.设计不佳的研究无助于阐明高压氧在慢性糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的作用。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2016 Sep;46(3):133-134.
7
Short-term contemporary outcomes for staged versus primary lower limb amputation in diabetic foot disease.分期与一期下肢截肢治疗糖尿病足病的近期临床结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):658-666.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.083. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
8
The use of fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix in severe diabetic foot ulceration and threatened limbs with tissue loss the use of FBADM as an adjunct for complex wounds.在严重糖尿病足溃疡和有组织损失危险的肢体中使用胎儿牛去细胞真皮基质,将 FBADM 用作复杂伤口的辅助治疗。
Vascular. 2024 Jun;32(3):619-625. doi: 10.1177/17085381221141115. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
Rate of residual osteomyelitis after partial foot amputation in diabetic patients: a standardized method for evaluating bone margins with intraoperative culture.糖尿病患者足部部分截肢术后残余骨髓炎的发生率:一种通过术中培养评估骨边缘的标准化方法。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;51(6):749-52. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
10
Topical antimicrobial agents for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.用于治疗糖尿病患者足部溃疡的局部抗菌剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 14;6(6):CD011038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011038.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of pathogenic microorganisms in diabetic foot infections and development of a risk prediction model.糖尿病足感染中致病微生物的特征分析及风险预测模型的建立
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07092-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Healing rates and outcomes following closed transmetatarsal amputations: A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of proportions.闭合性跖骨截肢术后的愈合率和结局:比例的系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析。
Wound Repair Regen. 2024 Mar-Apr;32(2):182-191. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13143. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
2
IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-related Foot Infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023).国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会糖尿病相关足部感染诊断与治疗指南(国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会,2023年)
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad527.
3
Mönckeberg's Medial Calcific Sclerosis Makes Traditional Arterial Doppler's Unreliable in High-Risk Patients with Diabetes.
门克贝格氏中膜钙化性硬化症使传统动脉多普勒检查在糖尿病高危患者中不可靠。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Jul 31:15347346231191588. doi: 10.1177/15347346231191588.
4
Performance of non-invasive bedside vascular testing in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among people with foot ulcers in diabetes: A systematic review.糖尿病足溃疡患者床边非侵入性血管检测对伤口愈合或截肢预测的性能:一项系统评价。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3701. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3701. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Mönckeberg's medial calcific sclerosis in diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections.糖尿病和非糖尿病足部感染中的蒙克贝格内侧钙化性硬化症
Wound Repair Regen. 2023 Jul-Aug;31(4):542-546. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13101. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
The Significance of the Global Vascular Guidelines for Podiatrists: Answers to Key Questions in the Diagnosis and Management of the Threatened Limb.全球血管指南对足病医生的意义:肢体威胁性疾病诊断与管理关键问题解答
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Mar 17. doi: 10.7547/20-217.
7
Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).糖尿病足感染的诊断和治疗指南(IWGDF 2019 更新)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3280. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3280.
8
Does negative pressure wound therapy with irrigation improve clinical outcomes? A randomized clinical trial in patients with diabetic foot infections.负压伤口治疗联合灌洗是否能改善临床结局?糖尿病足感染患者的随机临床试验。
Am J Surg. 2020 Oct;220(4):1076-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.044. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
9
Randomized clinical study to compare negative pressure wound therapy with simultaneous saline irrigation and traditional negative pressure wound therapy for complex foot infections.一项比较负压伤口疗法联合生理盐水冲洗与传统负压伤口疗法治疗复杂性足部感染的随机临床试验。
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Jan;28(1):97-104. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12741. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Comparison of Transtibial Amputations in Diabetic Patients With and Without End-Stage Renal Disease.糖尿病合并终末期肾病与未合并终末期肾病患者的经胫骨截肢术比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Apr;38(4):388-396. doi: 10.1177/1071100716688073. Epub 2017 Jan 19.