Hamed Abdelelah Abdelgadir, Shuib Sharfeldin Mohammed, Elhusein Amal Mohamed, Fadlalmola Hammad Ali, Higazy Omnia Abdalla, Mohammed Insaf Hassan, Mohamed Bahja Siddig, Abdelmalik Mohammed, Al-Sayaghi Khaled Mohammed, Saeed Abdalrahman Abdullatif Mohmmed, Hegazy Samya Mohamed, Albalawi Saud, Alrashidi Abdullah, Abdallah Mohamed
College of Nursing, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Najran University, Saudi Arabia.
College of Applied Medical Science, Department of Nursing, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Oct;39(5):324-334. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X24000621. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Approximately five million individuals have traumatic injuries annually. Implementing prehospital blood-component transfusion (PHBT), encompassing packed red blood cells (p-RBCs), plasma, or platelets, facilitates early hemostatic volume replacement following trauma. The lack of uniform PHBT guidelines persists, relying on diverse parameters and physician experience.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of various components of PHBT, including p-RBCs and plasma, on mortality and hematologic-related outcomes in traumatic patients.
A comprehensive search strategy was executed to identify pertinent literature comparing the transfusion of p-RBCs, plasma, or a combination of both with standard resuscitation care in traumatized patients. Eligible studies underwent independent screening, and pertinent data were systematically extracted. The analysis employed pooled risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous variables, each accompanied by their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Forty studies were included in the qualitative analysis, while 26 of them were included in the quantitative analysis. Solely P-RBCs alone or combined with plasma showed no substantial effect on 24-hour or long-term mortality (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.68 - 1.88; P = .63). Conversely, plasma transfusion alone exhibited a 28% reduction in 24-hour mortality with a RR of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.53 - 0.99; P = .04). In-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay were mostly unaffected by p-RBCs or p-RBCs plus plasma, except for a notable three-day reduction in length of hospital stay with p-RBCs alone (MD = -3.00; 95% CI, -5.01 to -0.99; P = .003). Hematological parameter analysis revealed nuanced effects, including a four-unit increase in RBC requirements with p-RBCs (MD = 3.95; 95% CI, 0.69 - 7.21; P = .02) and a substantial reduction in plasma requirements with plasma transfusion (MD = -0.73; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.17; P = .01).
This study revealed that plasma transfusion alone was associated with a substantial decrease in 24-hour mortality. Meanwhile, p-RBCs alone or combined with plasma did not significantly impact 24-hour or long-term mortality. In-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay were generally unaffected by p-RBCs or p-RBCs plus plasma, except for a substantial reduction in length of hospital stay with p-RBCs alone.
每年约有500万人遭受创伤性损伤。实施院前血液成分输血(PHBT),包括浓缩红细胞(p-RBCs)、血浆或血小板,有助于创伤后早期进行止血性容量补充。目前仍缺乏统一的PHBT指南,其依赖于各种不同的参数和医生经验。
本研究旨在评估PHBT的各种成分,包括p-RBCs和血浆,对创伤患者死亡率和血液学相关结局的疗效。
执行全面的检索策略,以识别比较p-RBCs、血浆或两者联合输注与创伤患者标准复苏治疗的相关文献。对符合条件的研究进行独立筛选,并系统提取相关数据。分析采用二分变量的合并风险比(RR)和连续变量的平均差(MD),并分别给出各自的95%置信区间(CI)。
40项研究纳入定性分析,其中26项纳入定量分析。单独输注p-RBCs或与血浆联合输注对24小时或长期死亡率均无显著影响(RR = 1.13;95%CI,0.68 - 1.88;P = 0.63)。相反,单独输注血浆使24小时死亡率降低28%,RR为0.72(95%CI,0.53 - 0.99;P = 0.04)。住院死亡率和住院时间大多不受p-RBCs或p-RBCs加血浆的影响,但单独输注p-RBCs可使住院时间显著缩短3天(MD = -3.00;95%CI,-5.01至-0.99;P = 0.003)。血液学参数分析显示出细微的影响,包括输注p-RBCs后红细胞需求量增加4个单位(MD = 3.95;95%CI,0.69 - 7.21;P = 0.02)以及输注血浆后血浆需求量大幅减少(MD = -0.73;95%CI,-1.28至-0.17;P = 0.01)。
本研究表明,单独输注血浆与24小时死亡率的显著降低相关。同时,单独输注p-RBCs或与血浆联合输注对24小时或长期死亡率均无显著影响。住院死亡率和住院时间一般不受p-RBCs或p-RBCs加血浆的影响,但单独输注p-RBCs可使住院时间大幅缩短。