Comparison of patients undergoing protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention using either intravascular lithotripsy or rotational atherectomy.

BACKGROUND

Treating heavily calcified vessels is a challenging task in patients with an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in patients in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI).

METHODS

In this retrospective registry, we investigated 25 patients undergoing a protected HRPCI receiving either intravascular lithotripsy (IVL + pMCS;  = 11) or rotational atherectomy (RA + pMCS;  = 14). The primary endpoint was defined as peri-interventional hemodynamic stability. The secondary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

Patients in the IVL + pMCS group had a significantly higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the end of the procedure ( = 0.04) However, the Δ-change in MAP was not significant [-12 mmHg (±20.3) vs. -16.1 mmHg (±23.9),  = 0.709]. The proportion of patients requiring post-interventional catecholamines was significantly lower in the IVL + pMCS group ( = 0.02) The Δ-change in Syntax Score was not significant between groups (IVL + pMCS -22 (±5.8) vs. RA + pMCS -21.2 (±7.6),  = 0.783). MACE did occur less in the group of IVL + pMCS (0% vs. 20%,  = 0.046). Patients with pMCS insertion as a bailout strategy had a higher probability for in-hospital death ( < 0.001) and the occurrence of the slow-reflow phenomenon was associated with long-term mortality ( = 0.021) in the cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort patients in the IVL + pMCS group were hemodynamically more stable which led to a lower rate of catecholamine usage. pMCS as a bailout strategy was associated with in-hospital death and the occurrence of the slow reflow phenomenon with all-cause mortality during follow-up.