Suppr超能文献

利用DNA甲基化创建可指导临床护理的表观遗传生物标志物替代物:精准医学的新框架。

Leveraging DNA methylation to create Epigenetic Biomarker Proxies that inform clinical care: A new framework for Precision Medicine.

作者信息

Carreras-Gallo Natàlia, Chen Qingwen, Balagué-Dobón Laura, Aparicio Andrea, Giosan Ilinca M, Dargham Rita, Phelps Daniel, Guo Tao, Mendez Kevin M, Chen Yulu, Carangan Athena, Vempaty Srikar, Hassouneh Sayf, McGeachie Michael, Mendez Tavis, Comite Florence, Suhre Karsten, Smith Ryan, Dwaraka Varun B, Lasky-Su Jessica A

机构信息

TruDiagnostic, Inc., Lexington, KY USA.

Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Dec 8:2024.12.06.24318612. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.06.24318612.

Abstract

The lack of accurate, cost-effective, and clinically relevant biomarkers remains a major barrier to incorporating omic data into clinical practice. Previous studies have shown that DNA methylation algorithms have utility as surrogate measures for selected proteins and metabolites. We expand upon this work by creating DNAm surrogates, termed epigenetic biomarker proxies (EBPs), across clinical laboratories, the metabolome, and the proteome. After screening >2,500 biomarkers, we trained and tested 1,694 EBP models and assessed their incident relationship with 12 chronic diseases and mortality, followed up to 15 years. We observe broad clinical relevance: 1) there are 1,292 and 4,863 FDR significant incident and prevalent associations, respectively; 2) most of these associations are replicated when looking at the lab-based counterpart, and > 62% of the shared associations have higher odds and hazard ratios to disease outcomes than their respective observed measurements; 3) EBPs of current clinical biochemistries detect deviations from normal with high sensitivity and specificity. Longitudinal EBPs also demonstrate significant changes corresponding to the changes observed in lab-based counterparts. Using two cohorts and > 30,000 individuals, we found that EBPs validate across healthy and sick populations. While further study is needed, these findings highlight the potential of implementing EBPs in a simple, low-cost, high-yield framework that benefits clinical medicine.

摘要

缺乏准确、具有成本效益且与临床相关的生物标志物仍然是将组学数据纳入临床实践的主要障碍。先前的研究表明,DNA甲基化算法可用作选定蛋白质和代谢物的替代指标。我们通过在临床实验室、代谢组和蛋白质组中创建称为表观遗传生物标志物代理(EBP)的DNAm替代物来扩展这项工作。在筛选了超过2500种生物标志物后,我们训练并测试了1694个EBP模型,并评估了它们与12种慢性疾病和死亡率的关联,随访时间长达15年。我们观察到广泛的临床相关性:1)分别有1292个和4863个FDR显著的发病和流行关联;2)在观察基于实验室的对应物时,这些关联中的大多数都得到了重复,并且超过62%的共享关联对疾病结局的优势比和风险比高于其各自观察到的测量值;3)当前临床生物化学的EBP能够以高灵敏度和特异性检测出与正常情况的偏差。纵向EBP也显示出与基于实验室的对应物中观察到的变化相对应的显著变化。使用两个队列和超过30000名个体,我们发现EBP在健康和患病群体中都得到了验证。虽然还需要进一步研究,但这些发现突出了在一个简单、低成本、高产出的框架中实施EBP对临床医学有益的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f6/11643242/22dbe3f5cf14/nihpp-2024.12.06.24318612v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验