• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手势特征可区分原发性进行性失语变体:一项初步研究。

Gesture profiles distinguish primary progressive aphasia variants: A preliminary study.

作者信息

Dresang Haley C, Williamson Rand, Kim Hana, Hillis Argye E, Buxbaum Laurel J

机构信息

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Rd, Elkins Park, PA 19027.

University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2024;38(11):1853-1868. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2326449. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1080/02687038.2024.2326449
PMID:39677853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11643405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized by progressive language deficits. The main variants of PPA -semantic (svPPA), logopenic (lvPPA), and nonfluent (nfvPPA)- can be challenging to distinguish. Limb apraxia often co-occurs with PPA, but it is unclear whether PPA variants are associated with different gesture deficits. Prior evidence from stroke indicates that temporal lobe lesions are associated with reduced benefit from meaning in gesture performance. Temporal lesions are also associated with greater deficits in hand postures compared to arm kinematics in gesture imitation.

AIMS

We tested the hypothesis that svPPA, who primarily exhibit temporal lobe atrophy, would differentially show this pattern. In addition, we predicted that as a group, individuals with PPA would more accurately produce meaningful than meaningless gestures and kinematic components than hand postures, as found in neurotypical adults and individuals with stroke.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: Participants with PPA completed meaningful and meaningless gesture imitation tasks. Performance was scored for hand posture and arm kinematic components. Bayesian mixed-effect models examined trial-level gesture imitation accuracy, while controlling for dementia severity and random effects of subjects and items. Fixed effects included an interaction between PPA variant, task condition/meaning, and gesture component.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: We found a critical interaction between PPA variant, meaning, and gesture component. In particular, unlike lvPPA and nfvPPA, svPPA subjects' hand postures failed to benefit from gesture meaning. This preliminary research extends prior findings on the role of the temporal lobe in action representations associated with manipulable objects, and is among the first to demonstrate distinct gesture imitation patterns between PPA variants.

CONCLUSIONS

Characterizing gesture deficits in PPA may help inform diagnostics, compensatory communication strategies, and models of praxis.

摘要

背景

原发性进行性失语(PPA)是一种以进行性语言缺陷为特征的神经退行性综合征。PPA的主要变体——语义性(svPPA)、音韵性(lvPPA)和非流利性(nfvPPA)——可能难以区分。肢体失用症常与PPA同时出现,但尚不清楚PPA变体是否与不同的手势缺陷相关。先前中风的证据表明,颞叶病变与手势表现中从意义中获得的益处减少有关。与手势模仿中的手臂运动学相比,颞叶病变还与手部姿势的更大缺陷有关。

目的

我们检验了以下假设,即主要表现为颞叶萎缩的svPPA会有不同的这种模式表现。此外,我们预测,与典型成年人和中风患者一样,PPA患者作为一个群体,在做出有意义的手势和运动成分时会比无意义的手势和手部姿势更准确。

方法与程序

PPA患者完成有意义和无意义的手势模仿任务。对手部姿势和手臂运动成分的表现进行评分。贝叶斯混合效应模型在控制痴呆严重程度以及受试者和项目的随机效应的同时,检验试验水平的手势模仿准确性。固定效应包括PPA变体、任务条件/意义和手势成分之间的相互作用。

结果

我们发现PPA变体、意义和手势成分之间存在关键的相互作用。特别是,与lvPPA和nfvPPA不同,svPPA受试者的手部姿势未能从手势意义中受益。这项初步研究扩展了先前关于颞叶在与可操作物体相关的动作表征中的作用的研究结果,并且是最早证明PPA变体之间存在不同手势模仿模式的研究之一。

结论

描述PPA中的手势缺陷可能有助于为诊断、代偿性沟通策略和实践模型提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/11643405/b6122faa9aa7/nihms-1972476-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/11643405/b6122faa9aa7/nihms-1972476-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ea/11643405/b6122faa9aa7/nihms-1972476-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Gesture profiles distinguish primary progressive aphasia variants: A preliminary study.手势特征可区分原发性进行性失语变体:一项初步研究。
Aphasiology. 2024;38(11):1853-1868. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2326449. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Gesture profiles distinguish primary progressive aphasia variants.手势特征可区分原发性进行性失语症的不同变体。
bioRxiv. 2023 Jan 19:2023.01.19.524719. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.19.524719.
3
Shared and distinct routes in speech and gesture imitation: Evidence from stroke.言语和手势模仿中的共享和独特途径:来自中风的证据。
Cortex. 2023 May;162:81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
Motor speech disorders in the nonfluent, semantic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语非流利型、语义型和经皮质性运动性失语的运动性言语障碍。
Cortex. 2021 Jul;140:66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
Utility of the Repeat and Point Test for Subtyping Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia.重复测试和点测试在原发性进行性失语症患者亚型分型中的效用。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2022;36(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000482.
6
Differential chemokine alteration in the variants of primary progressive aphasia-a role for neuroinflammation.原发性进行性失语症变体中的差异化学趋化因子改变——神经炎症的作用。
J Neuroinflammation. 2021 Oct 3;18(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02247-3.
7
A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Functioning in the Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia: Comparison with the Semantic and Non-Fluent Variants.《语义型和非流利型原发性进行性失语的失语法变异型的神经心理学功能:荟萃分析比较》。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Mar;26(3):322-330. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719001115. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
8
Clinical and neuroimaging characteristics of primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语症的临床和神经影像学特征。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;185:81-97. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823384-9.00016-5.
9
Connected Speech Alterations and Progression in Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia Variants.原发性进行性失语变体患者的连贯言语改变与进展
Neurology. 2025 May 13;104(9):e213524. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213524. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
10
Primary Progressive Aphasia Associated With Mutations: New Insights Into the Nonamyloid Logopenic Variant.原发性进行性失语症伴突变:对非淀粉样蛋白性流畅性失语变体的新认识。
Neurology. 2021 Jul 6;97(1):e88-e102. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012174. Epub 2021 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared and distinct routes in speech and gesture imitation: Evidence from stroke.言语和手势模仿中的共享和独特途径:来自中风的证据。
Cortex. 2023 May;162:81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Neural regions underlying object and action naming: Complementary evidence from acute stroke and primary progressive aphasia.物体和动作命名背后的神经区域:来自急性中风和原发性进行性失语症的补充证据。
Aphasiology. 2022;36(6):732-760. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2021.1907291. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
The role of the anterior temporal cortex in action: evidence from fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis during real object grasping.额前颞叶皮质在动作中的作用:来自 fMRI 多元搜索光分析在真实物体抓握中的证据。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 5;12(1):9042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12174-9.
5
Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia: Practical Recommendations for Treatment from 20 Years of Behavioural Research.语义变异型原发性进行性失语:基于20年行为研究的实用治疗建议
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 23;11(12):1552. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121552.
6
Longitudinal Changes in Cognition, Behaviours, and Functional Abilities in the Three Main Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Literature Review.原发性进行性失语三种主要变体的认知、行为和功能能力的纵向变化:文献综述
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 14;11(9):1209. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091209.
7
Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines.贝叶斯分析报告指南。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1282-1291. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Semantic and action tool knowledge in the brain: Identifying common and distinct networks.大脑中的语义和动作工具知识:识别共同和独特的网络。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Aug 20;159:107918. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107918. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Decoding stimuli (tool-hand) and viewpoint invariant grasp-type information.解码刺激物(工具手)和视角不变的抓握类型信息。
Cortex. 2021 Jun;139:152-165. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
10
Effect of body-part specificity and meaning in gesture imitation in left hemisphere stroke patients.手势模仿中身体部位特异性和意义对左半球卒中患者的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jan 22;151:107720. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107720. Epub 2020 Dec 9.