• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生存环境和心理指标对回忆的影响。

The Influence of Survival Context and Psychological Markers on Recall.

作者信息

Sayar Filiz

机构信息

Yalova University Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Yalova, Türkiye.

出版信息

Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Nov 28;61(4):363-369. doi: 10.29399/npa.28724. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.29399/npa.28724
PMID:39678051
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11638575/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research shows that stimuli rated for their relevance to a survival scenario have a higher recall probability when compared to other deep encoding conditions. This phenomenon, known as survival memory advantage, is a robust finding that has been demonstrated by various experimental manipulations. The current study aimed to examine associations between participants' psychological markers (perceived stress, anxiety, coping, cognitive control, and flexibility) and their memory performance in survival and other encoding conditions (fight, flight, and pleasantness).

METHODS

A total of 141 undergraduates aged 18-35 years participated voluntarily in the study. Four scenario situations (fight, flight, survival, or pleasantness) were randomly allocated to participants, and then they were given a list of words to rate for their relevance to the scenarios. Participants were given a free recall task to measure their memory, while some psychological scales (perceived stress, anxiety level, coping strategies, cognitive control, and flexibility) were administered to assess their psychological markers.

RESULTS

Survival conditions yielded the highest correct recall. Pairwise comparisons showed that difference between survival and pleasant conditions was significant (p<0.05). The other conditions did not differ significantly from one another. Regression analyses revealed that anxiety level may explain 13% of variance in survival condition and 14% of variance in fight condition. No significant effect was found on flight conditions.

CONCLUSION

Recall performance did not significantly differ between survival, fight, and flight conditions. However, anxiety level in survival conditions and support seeking in fight condition were found to be negative predictors of recollection. According to these results, associations between concepts of anxiety and survival, and between support seeking and fight (struggle) in human mind determine memory processes at a significant level. Individuals' psychological characteristics and coping strategies have different effects on recall depending on the context.

摘要

引言

研究表明,与其他深度编码条件相比,被评定为与生存场景相关的刺激具有更高的回忆概率。这种现象被称为生存记忆优势,是一个通过各种实验操作得到证实的有力发现。本研究旨在考察参与者的心理指标(感知压力、焦虑、应对方式、认知控制和灵活性)与他们在生存及其他编码条件(战斗、逃跑和愉悦)下的记忆表现之间的关联。

方法

共有141名年龄在18至35岁之间的本科生自愿参与本研究。四种场景情况(战斗、逃跑、生存或愉悦)被随机分配给参与者,然后给他们一份单词列表,让他们评定这些单词与场景的相关性。参与者接受自由回忆任务以测量他们的记忆,同时使用一些心理量表(感知压力、焦虑水平、应对策略、认知控制和灵活性)来评估他们的心理指标。

结果

生存条件下的正确回忆率最高。两两比较显示,生存条件和愉悦条件之间的差异显著(p<0.05)。其他条件之间没有显著差异。回归分析表明,焦虑水平可能解释生存条件下13%的方差和战斗条件下14%的方差。在逃跑条件下未发现显著影响。

结论

生存、战斗和逃跑条件下的回忆表现没有显著差异。然而,发现生存条件下的焦虑水平和战斗条件下的寻求支持是回忆的负向预测因素。根据这些结果,焦虑与生存概念之间以及寻求支持与战斗(挣扎)在人类思维中的关联在很大程度上决定了记忆过程。个体的心理特征和应对策略根据情境对回忆有不同的影响。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Survival Context and Psychological Markers on Recall.生存环境和心理指标对回忆的影响。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Nov 28;61(4):363-369. doi: 10.29399/npa.28724. eCollection 2024.
2
Both the Survival Scenario and the Death Scenario Improve Memory Recall Regardless of the Processing/Priming Paradigm.无论加工/启动范式如何,生存情景和死亡情景均能改善记忆回忆。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00793. eCollection 2018.
3
Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities?生存加工记忆优势是否基于祖先的优先级?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):564-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0060-6.
4
A global survey on the associations between the lockdown group, free memory recall and emotional responses during the COVID-19 lockdown.一项关于新冠疫情封锁期间封锁组、自由记忆回忆与情绪反应之间关联的全球调查。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 10;15(1):12220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91991-0.
5
The survival processing effect in episodic memory in older adults and stroke patients.老年人和中风患者情节记忆中的生存加工效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Aug;248:104390. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104390. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
6
Picturing survival memories: enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli.想象生存记忆:与健身相关的处理后,言语和视觉刺激的记忆增强。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):23-8. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.23.
7
How can survival processing improve memory encoding?生存加工如何改善记忆编码?
Sci China Life Sci. 2013 Nov;56(11):1028-37. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4537-6. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
8
The effect of survival processing on memory for pictures depends on how memory is tested.对图片的记忆而言,生存加工的效果取决于记忆的测试方式。
Memory. 2023 Apr;31(4):502-508. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2171436. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
9
The longevity of adaptive memory: evidence for mnemonic advantages of survival processing 24 and 48 hours later.适应记忆的持久性:生存处理在 24 和 48 小时后具有记忆优势的证据。
Memory. 2014;22(1):19-25. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.791321. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
Adaptive memory: the survival scenario enhances item-specific processing relative to a moving scenario.适应记忆:生存场景相对于移动场景增强了项目特异性加工。
Memory. 2013;21(6):695-706. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.752506. Epub 2012 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship of Anxiety and Stress With Working Memory Performance in a Large Non-depressed Sample.在一个大型非抑郁样本中焦虑和压力与工作记忆表现的关系
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 23;10:4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00004. eCollection 2019.
2
Stress and multiple memory systems: from 'thinking' to 'doing'.压力与多重记忆系统:从“思考”到“行动”。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Feb;17(2):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
Extensions of the survival advantage in memory: examining the role of ancestral context and implied social isolation.生存优势的延伸:考察祖先背景和隐含社会隔离的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):1091-8. doi: 10.1037/a0026974. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
Survival processing in times of stress.应激时的生存加工。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):113-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0180-z.
5
On the plasticity of the survival processing effect.生存加工效应的可塑性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1553-62. doi: 10.1037/a0024493. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
6
Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities?生存加工记忆优势是否基于祖先的优先级?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):564-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0060-6.
7
Adaptive memory: ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing.适应记忆:祖先的优先级和生存处理的记忆价值。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Aug;61(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
8
Facing the future: memory as an evolved system for planning future acts.面向未来:记忆作为一种进化的系统,用于规划未来的行为。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):13-22. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.13.
9
The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information.处理与健康相关信息的记忆优势。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1151-6. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1151.
10
Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?生存回忆优势能否用基本记忆过程来解释?
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):913-9. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.913.