• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大五人格特质、认知能力与气候信念及行为之间的关联:来自英国一个出生队列的纵向研究结果

Associations Between Big-5 Personality Traits, Cognitive Ability, and Climate Beliefs and Behaviours: Results From a Longitudinal UK Birth Cohort.

作者信息

Freminot Ken, Major-Smith Katie, Northstone Kate, Halstead Isaac, Major-Smith Daniel

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Sustainability, Creativity and Innovation Research Group, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Psychol. 2024 Nov 29;20(4):288-302. doi: 10.5964/ejop.13657. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.5964/ejop.13657
PMID:39678302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11636718/
Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change is an existential threat to both humans and wider biodiversity. However, cumulatively, individuals' actions can help to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Understanding the factors which shape individuals' beliefs about climate change, and their environmental behaviours, is therefore crucial. Here, we explore whether individual differences-Big-5 personality traits and cognitive ability-are associated with climate beliefs and behaviours, using longitudinal data from a UK birth cohort study. Individual differences were measured when the participants were teenagers (aged 13 to 15 years), with climate beliefs and behaviours assessed at approximately age 30 years. These climate beliefs and behaviours included: belief that the climate is changing, concern over climate change, whether humans are to blame for climate change, whether individual actions can mitigate climate change, and whether they were undertaking a range of pro-environmental behaviours for climate reasons (e.g., reducing air travel, reducing meat/dairy consumption). Regression models were used to explore the associations between individual differences and climate belief and behaviour outcomes, adjusting for a range of relevant sociodemographic confounders. Overall, we found consistent positive associations between agreeableness, openness to experience and cognitive ability scores and environmental knowledge and action. Weaker, and more inconsistent, associations were reported for extraversion, conscientiousness and emotional stability. These results suggest that individual differences may shape an individual's beliefs and actions regarding climate change, and potentially indicates groups where climate information campaigns could be targeted.

摘要

人为气候变化对人类和更广泛的生物多样性构成了生存威胁。然而,总体而言,个人行动有助于减轻气候变化的影响。因此,了解影响个人对气候变化的信念及其环境行为的因素至关重要。在此,我们利用英国一个出生队列研究的纵向数据,探讨个体差异——大五人格特质和认知能力——是否与气候信念和行为相关。个体差异是在参与者为青少年(13至15岁)时进行测量的,气候信念和行为则在大约30岁时进行评估。这些气候信念和行为包括:相信气候正在变化、对气候变化的担忧、人类是否应为气候变化负责、个人行动是否能减轻气候变化,以及他们是否出于气候原因采取一系列环保行为(例如,减少航空旅行、减少肉类/乳制品消费)。回归模型用于探讨个体差异与气候信念和行为结果之间的关联,并对一系列相关的社会人口学混杂因素进行了调整。总体而言,我们发现宜人性、经验开放性和认知能力得分与环境知识和行动之间存在一致的正相关。外向性、尽责性和情绪稳定性的关联较弱且更不一致。这些结果表明,个体差异可能会塑造个人对气候变化的信念和行动,并可能指出气候信息宣传活动可以针对的群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/b45f6b811b64/ejop-20-13657-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/3053b5416e3d/ejop-20-13657-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/273902eb4ce0/ejop-20-13657-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/1615c0a22689/ejop-20-13657-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/b45f6b811b64/ejop-20-13657-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/3053b5416e3d/ejop-20-13657-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/273902eb4ce0/ejop-20-13657-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/1615c0a22689/ejop-20-13657-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d6/11636718/b45f6b811b64/ejop-20-13657-g04.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations Between Big-5 Personality Traits, Cognitive Ability, and Climate Beliefs and Behaviours: Results From a Longitudinal UK Birth Cohort.大五人格特质、认知能力与气候信念及行为之间的关联:来自英国一个出生队列的纵向研究结果
Eur J Psychol. 2024 Nov 29;20(4):288-302. doi: 10.5964/ejop.13657. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Exploring associations between the Big Five personality traits and cognitive ability with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake among mothers and offspring in a UK prospective cohort study.在一项英国前瞻性队列研究中,探究“大五”人格特质和认知能力与母亲及后代新冠疫苗接种犹豫和接种情况之间的关联。
Vaccine. 2024 Apr 19;42(11):2817-2826. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Predicting disordered gambling across adolescence and young adulthood from polygenic contributions to Big 5 personality traits in a UK birth cohort.从英国出生队列中对大五人格特质的多基因贡献预测青少年和青年期的无序赌博。
Addiction. 2022 Mar;117(3):690-700. doi: 10.1111/add.15648. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Believing in or Denying Climate Change for Questionable Reasons: Generic Conspiracist Beliefs, Personality, and Climate Change Perceptions of Romanian University Students.基于可疑理由相信或否认气候变化:罗马尼亚大学生的一般阴谋论信仰、人格与气候变化认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17038. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417038.
5
Personality and eating habits revisited: Associations between the big five, food choices, and Body Mass Index in a representative Australian sample.人格与饮食习惯再探讨:在澳大利亚代表性样本中,大五人格、食物选择与身体质量指数的关联。
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104607. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104607. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Individuals' contribution to household energy savings: The role of big-two personality traits.个人对家庭能源节约的贡献:“大五”人格特质的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25922. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25922. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
7
Personality traits, oral health beliefs, and periodontal parameters in patients with periodontitis.牙周炎患者的人格特质、口腔健康观念和牙周参数
Quintessence Int. 2023 Mar 17;54(3):200-208. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b3648947.
8
Personality traits, self-care behaviours and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle diabetes study phase II.2 型糖尿病患者的人格特质、自我保健行为与血糖控制:弗里曼特尔糖尿病研究二期。
Diabet Med. 2014 Apr;31(4):487-92. doi: 10.1111/dme.12339. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
9
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review.超自然信念与个体差异:未经理性审视的故事探寻
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 30;6(6):e04259. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04259. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Association of big-5 personality traits with cognitive impairment and dementia: a longitudinal study.大五人格特质与认知障碍和痴呆的关系:一项纵向研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):799-805. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213014. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Does concern regarding climate change impact subsequent mental health? A longitudinal analysis using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).对气候变化的担忧会影响随后的心理健康吗?一项使用阿冯父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC)数据的纵向分析。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 6;12(8):251099. doi: 10.1098/rsos.251099. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Releasing synthetic data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): Guidelines and applied examples.发布来自阿冯纵向父母与儿童研究(ALSPAC)的合成数据:指南及应用示例。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 24;9:57. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20530.2. eCollection 2024.
2
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray.i 帧和 s 帧:关注个体层面的解决方案如何使行为公共政策误入歧途。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 5;46:e147. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002023.
3
Agreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings.
宜人性及其后果:元分析研究结果的定量综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Aug;26(3):242-280. doi: 10.1177/10888683211073007. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Behaviour change to address climate change.为应对气候变化而进行的行为改变。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Stability and Change in Personality Traits and Major Life Goals From College to Midlife.人格特质和主要生活目标从大学到中年的稳定性和变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 May;47(5):841-858. doi: 10.1177/0146167220949362. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis.大五人格和 HEXACO 人格特质、亲环境态度和行为:一项元分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;15(4):913-941. doi: 10.1177/1745691620903019. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): an update on the enrolled sample of index children in 2019.雅芳亲子纵向研究(ALSPAC):2019年研究对象儿童登记样本的最新情况
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Mar 14;4:51. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15132.1. eCollection 2019.
8
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.谁容易相信假新闻?易受胡编乱造影响、过度自信、熟悉度和分析思维的作用。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis.教育对智力的提升有多大作用?一项元分析。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;29(8):1358-1369. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774253. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations.碰撞范围:当选择偏差可能对观察到的关联产生实质性影响时。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):226-235. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx206.