Suppr超能文献

日间手术模式下机器人辅助电视胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的短期疗效

Short-term outcomes of robotic- television-assisted thoracoscopic segmental lung resection for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer in the day surgery models.

作者信息

Wang Yusheng, Meng Chaofan, Shi Liang, Gu Shuang, Fan Xiao, Wang Qianyun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Changzhou City, Changzhou, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):7257-7270. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1020. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, few articles compare the differences between robot-assisted thoracic surgeries (RATSs) and video-assisted thoracic surgeries (VATSs) in the day surgery model and there is also little literature on what factors influence delayed discharge from day surgery. This study aims to compare short-term outcomes between RATS and VATS for segmental lung resection in a day surgery setting, and to identify risk factors for delayed discharge.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 204 patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent segmental lung resection via RATS or VATS at the First People's Hospital of Changzhou City from January 2021 to December 2023. The clinical data and short-term efficacy of the two groups were compared, and the patients were divided into two subgroups based on whether the patients were discharged within 48 hours. One group was day surgery patients who were discharged within 48 hours, and the other group was day surgery patients with delayed discharge, so as to explore the factors affecting the delayed discharge of day surgery.

RESULTS

Compared to the VATS group, the RATS group had a shorter average surgery duration (58.59±12.20 66.12±21.56 min, P<0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (98.77±51.50 128.87±65.79 mL, P=0.02), lower total postoperative drainage (185.44±109.14 268.70±147.99 mL, P=0.007), and a shorter postoperative drainage duration (1.74±0.30 2.29±0.98 days, P=0.045). The patients experienced less pain, with lower total drug dose of intramuscular diclofenac sodium lidocaine injection and oral celecoxib capsules (111.76±40.52 167.74±67.20 mg, P<0.001) and reduced pain scores (3.29±0.66 4.31±0.81, P=0.003). Fewer patients in the RATS group experienced delayed discharges (11 39, P<0.001), and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower (nausea and vomiting: 3.9% 3.9%, fever: 4.9% 13.5%, pulmonary atelectasis: 0% 2.0%, infection: 1.0% 2.9%, air leakage: 6.9% 8.8%, abnormal drainage fluid: 0% 8.8%, P=0.23; recovery: P=0.27). Meanwhile, subgroup analysis revealed that the four indicators of 24-hour postoperative analgesic medication, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and tumor history were statistically significant (tumor history: P=0.04; intraoperative bleeding: P=0.005; use of analgesic medication in the 24-hour postoperative period: P=0.001; duration of surgery: P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgery setting, RATSs showed better outcomes compared to VATSs, including shorter surgical duration, reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative drainage volume, shorter drainage duration, and fewer postoperative complications. History of tumor, intraoperative bleeding, use of analgesic medication in the 24-hour postoperative period, and duration of surgery were risk factors for delayed discharge from day surgery.

摘要

背景

目前,很少有文章比较机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)和电视辅助胸外科手术(VATS)在日间手术模式下的差异,关于影响日间手术延迟出院的因素的文献也很少。本研究旨在比较RATS和VATS在日间手术环境下进行肺段切除的短期结局,并确定延迟出院的危险因素。

方法

对2021年1月至2023年12月在常州市第一人民医院通过RATS或VATS进行肺段切除的204例早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行回顾性分析。比较两组的临床资料和短期疗效,并根据患者是否在48小时内出院将患者分为两个亚组。一组是在48小时内出院的日间手术患者,另一组是延迟出院的日间手术患者,以探讨影响日间手术延迟出院的因素。

结果

与VATS组相比,RATS组的平均手术时间较短(58.59±12.20对66.12±21.56分钟,P<0.001),术中出血量较少(98.77±51.50对128.87±65.79毫升,P=0.02),术后总引流量较低(185.44±109.14对268.70±147.99毫升,P=0.007),术后引流时间较短(1.74±0.30对2.29±0.98天,P=0.045)。患者疼痛较轻,肌肉注射双氯芬酸钠利多卡因注射液和口服塞来昔布胶囊的总药物剂量较低(111.76±40.52对167.74±67.20毫克,P<0.001),疼痛评分降低(3.29±0.66对4.31±0.81,P=0.003)。RATS组延迟出院的患者较少(11对39,P<0.001),术后并发症发生率较低(恶心呕吐:3.9%对3.9%,发热:4.9%对13.5%,肺不张:0%对2.0%,感染:1.0%对2.9%,漏气:6.9%对8.8%,引流液异常:0%对8.8%,P=0.23;恢复情况:P=0.27)。同时,亚组分析显示术后24小时镇痛用药、手术时间、术中出血和肿瘤病史这四个指标具有统计学意义(肿瘤病史:P=0.04;术中出血:P=0.005;术后24小时镇痛用药:P=0.001;手术时长:P=0.008)。

结论

在手术环境中,与VATS相比,RATS显示出更好的结局,包括手术时间更短、术中出血量减少、术后引流量更低、引流时间更短以及术后并发症更少。肿瘤病史、术中出血、术后24小时镇痛用药和手术时长是日间手术延迟出院的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92d/11635280/f36f0cf7d95e/jtd-16-11-7257-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验