Arabkhazaie Azar, Sadeghi Noghabi Zahra, Basiri Moghadam Mehrsa, Saheban Maleki Mohsen, Aalami Hossein
Department of Operation Room, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Department of Anesthesiology, Student Research Committee, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Sep 28;13:344. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_953_23. eCollection 2024.
Sore throat and hoarseness are two common complications of intubation in patients with general anesthesia. This research aimed to compare the effect of different endotracheal cuff pressures on sore throat and hoarseness after general anesthesia.
The present double-blinded clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients who are candidates for surgery with general anesthesia in autumn and winter 2021. The participants were divided into three groups of 15 through a permuted block randomization. The 20-24 cm H2O (level of pressure) group was labeled as A, and the 25-29 cm H2O group B and the 30-34 cm H2O group was known as group C. All the patients were operated. The endotracheal intubation was done for men with tubes #8-8.5 and for women with tubes 7-7.5. The presence and severity sore throat and the hoarseness after operation were checked by a nurse after recovery. Data were recorded in a researcher-made checklist. The data were analyzed in SPSS 19. <0.05 was considered.
The results revealed that the majority of participants suffered a slight hoarseness within the 1 hour (73.3%), 12 hour (91.1%), and 24 hour (100%) after recovery. Similarly, most participants experienced a slight hoarseness in the 1 hour (57.8%), 12 hour (71.1%), and 24 hour (91.1%) after recovery. Kruskal-Wallis test results showed no statistically significant correlation between hoarseness and the level of endotracheal cuff pressure in the three groups ( > .05).
According to the results of the present study, despite the fact that the range of 20 to 34 cm of water is a safe and risk-free range in terms of causing sore throat and hoarseness, and there was no difference between the pressures in the three groups, but at higher pressure (groups 2 and 3), the amount of sore throat and hoarseness was more and there was a statistically significant difference at different times within group. Therefore, as much as possible, the amount of pressure should be adjusted according to the need and avoid applying excess pressure.
咽喉疼痛和声音嘶哑是全身麻醉患者插管后的两种常见并发症。本研究旨在比较不同气管内套管压力对全身麻醉后咽喉疼痛和声音嘶哑的影响。
本双盲临床试验于2021年秋冬对45例拟行全身麻醉手术的患者进行。通过置换区组随机化将参与者分为三组,每组15人。压力水平为20 - 24厘米水柱的组标记为A组,25 - 29厘米水柱的组为B组,30 - 34厘米水柱的组为C组。所有患者均接受手术。男性使用8 - 8.5号气管导管,女性使用7 - 7.5号气管导管进行气管插管。术后恢复后由护士检查咽喉疼痛的存在及严重程度和声音嘶哑情况。数据记录在研究者制作的检查表中。数据在SPSS 19中进行分析。P < 0.05被视为有统计学意义。
结果显示,大多数参与者在恢复后的1小时(73.3%)、12小时(91.1%)和24小时(100%)内出现轻度声音嘶哑。同样,大多数参与者在恢复后的1小时(57.8%)、12小时(71.1%)和24小时(91.1%)内经历轻度咽喉疼痛。Kruskal - Wallis检验结果显示,三组中声音嘶哑与气管内套管压力水平之间无统计学显著相关性(P > 0.05)。
根据本研究结果,尽管20至34厘米水柱的范围在引起咽喉疼痛和声音嘶哑方面是一个安全无风险的范围,且三组压力之间无差异,但在较高压力组(第2组和第3组),咽喉疼痛和声音嘶哑的程度更严重,且组内不同时间存在统计学显著差异。因此,应尽可能根据需要调整压力量,避免施加过大压力。