Mohamadi Jahromi Leila Sadat, Dashtimakan Hadi, Roshanzamir Sharareh, Dabbaghmanesh Alireza, Parvin Reyhaneh
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Shiraz, Iran.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug 26;70(3):327-334. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.12937. eCollection 2024 Sep.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion.
Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.2 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group A and 24 cases (9 males, 15 females; mean age: 54.7±4.6 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group B were recruited. Group A received intra-articular DPT, while Group B received peri-articular DPT. Treatment was administered two times with two-week intervals. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) questionnaires were filled at baseline, and four and eight weeks after first injection.
At four and eight weeks, the VAS, OKS, and WOMAC scores improved from baseline in both groups. There was no significant difference in the WOMAC and OKS scores between two methods. The VAS scores showed superiority of intra-articular method (p<0.05).
Both peri-articular and intra-articular DPT were effective in patients with KOA. There was no superiority in terms of functional improvement between two groups. However, intra-articular prolotherapy was more effective in decreasing pain in these patients.
本研究旨在比较关节内和关节周围葡萄糖注射疗法(DPT)对无积液的膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者的疗效。
在2018年8月至2018年11月期间,共招募了51名参与者,其中A组27例(男性12例,女性15例;平均年龄:55.7±5.2岁;范围38至70岁),B组24例(男性9例,女性15例;平均年龄:54.7±4.6岁;范围38至70岁)。A组接受关节内DPT,而B组接受关节周围DPT。治疗进行两次,间隔两周。在基线、首次注射后四周和八周时填写视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及牛津膝关节量表(OKS)问卷。
在四周和八周时,两组的VAS、OKS和WOMAC评分均较基线有所改善。两种方法在WOMAC和OKS评分上无显著差异。VAS评分显示关节内方法具有优越性(p<0.05)。
关节周围和关节内DPT对KOA患者均有效。两组在功能改善方面无优越性。然而,关节内注射疗法在减轻这些患者疼痛方面更有效。