Eronen Aslak, Janhunen Matti, Hyvärinen Pekka, Kortet Raine, Karvonen Anssi
Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences University of Eastern Finland Joensuu Finland.
Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE) Migratory Fish and Regulated Rivers Joensuu Finland.
Evol Appl. 2024 Dec 13;17(12):e70056. doi: 10.1111/eva.70056. eCollection 2024 Dec.
A prerequisite of genetic rescue in endangered and genetically depauperate populations is to pre-evaluate between possible pros and cons of hybridization for the life history and survival of the target population. We hybridized the critically endangered Saimaa landlocked salmon ( m. ) with one of its geographically closest relatives, anadromous Baltic salmon from River Kymijoki. In two similar experiments, conducted in semi-natural streams during overwintering (at age 1.5) and in early summer (age 2+), we studied how hybridization and eye parasite infection () affected survival from predation by Northern pike (). Additionally, we recorded movements of the juvenile salmon using passive integrated telemetry to gain insights into the effect of hybridization and infection on antipredatory behaviour (movement activity and habitat use). Among the uninfected groups, we found significantly lower mortality of hybrid salmon (mortality ± S.E. 14.5% ± 5.4%) compared to purebred landlocked salmon (37.2% ± 9.4%), supporting a positive effect of hybridization under predation risk. This benefit, however, was cancelled out by the parasite infection, which impaired vision and increased the susceptibility to predation. The negative effects of infection were particularly pronounced in the anadromous salmon due to lower infection resistance, compared to the landlocked salmon. Hybridization per se did not affect the activity levels of salmon, but overwintering activity correlated positively with eye cataract coverage, and summer activity was highest in anadromous salmon. These results demonstrate that controlled supplementation of a small animal population with genetically more diverse hybrids could entail both positive and negative implications, at least in the first crossbred generation.
在濒危和基因匮乏的种群中进行基因拯救的一个前提条件是,预先评估杂交对于目标种群的生活史和生存可能产生的利弊。我们将极度濒危的塞马湖内陆鲑(m.)与其地理上最接近的近亲之一、来自屈米约基河的洄游型波罗的海鲑进行了杂交。在两项类似的实验中,一项在越冬期间(1.5龄)于半自然溪流中进行,另一项在初夏(2龄以上)进行,我们研究了杂交和眼部寄生虫感染()如何影响白斑狗鱼()捕食造成的生存情况。此外,我们使用被动集成遥测技术记录了幼鲑的活动,以深入了解杂交和感染对反捕食行为(活动水平和栖息地利用)的影响。在未感染的组中,我们发现杂交鲑的死亡率(死亡率±标准误14.5%±5.4%)显著低于纯种内陆鲑(37.2%±9.4%),这支持了在捕食风险下杂交具有积极作用的观点。然而,这种益处被寄生虫感染抵消了,寄生虫感染损害了视力并增加了被捕食的易感性。与内陆鲑相比,由于感染抵抗力较低,感染的负面影响在洄游型鲑中尤为明显。杂交本身并未影响鲑的活动水平,但越冬活动与白内障覆盖率呈正相关,且夏季活动在洄游型鲑中最高。这些结果表明,用基因上更多样化的杂交种对一个小型动物种群进行受控补充可能会带来积极和消极两方面的影响,至少在第一代杂交后代中是这样。