• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据公众对辐射的知识和信念差异进行分类——按态度、知识、信念和焦虑进行聚类分析

Segmentation of the general public according to differences in knowledge and beliefs about radiation-cluster analysis by attitude, knowledge, belief and anxiety.

作者信息

Hirai Kei, Yamamura Asayo, Matsumura Yuko, Miura Asako, Yagi Ekou, Fujino Ryohei, Tsubokura Masaharu, Ohtaka Fumio

机构信息

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, 1-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

Department of Health Welfare, Kansai University of Welfare Sciences, 3-11-1 Asahigaoka, Kasiwara, Osaka 582-0026, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2024 Dec 16;65(Supplement_1):i42-i51. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae030.

DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrae030
PMID:39679894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11647920/
Abstract

Following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, public behaviors have been marked by excessive avoidance and stigma, driven by fear and uncertainty regarding radiation exposure and its health implications. Despite extensive media dissemination of information on radiation, the precise nature of the public's knowledge, beliefs and the resultant behavioral responses remain unclear. This study aimed to segment the population based on their attitudes, knowledge, beliefs and anxiety levels about radiation, correlating these factors with their cognitive and behavioral responses to radiation exposure. Surveying 2400 individuals, we identified seven distinct segments that illustrated a spectrum of health concerns, even among those well-informed about radiation. Notably, individuals with higher health anxiety were found to reject discriminatory prejudices linked to radiation, yet they tended to distrust official information, potentially as a psychological mechanism to justify their avoidance behaviors. These findings underscore the need for tailored communication strategies that address the complex landscape of radiation-related perceptions and misinformation.

摘要

2011年福岛第一核电站事故后,公众行为以过度回避和污名化为特征,这是由对辐射暴露及其健康影响的恐惧和不确定性所驱动的。尽管媒体广泛传播了有关辐射的信息,但公众的知识、信念的确切性质以及由此产生的行为反应仍不清楚。本研究旨在根据公众对辐射的态度、知识、信念和焦虑水平对人群进行细分,并将这些因素与其对辐射暴露的认知和行为反应相关联。通过对2400人进行调查,我们确定了七个不同的群体,这些群体表明了一系列健康问题,即使在那些对辐射了解很多的人当中也是如此。值得注意的是,健康焦虑较高的个体被发现拒绝与辐射相关的歧视性偏见,但他们往往不信任官方信息,这可能是一种心理机制,用以证明他们的回避行为是合理的。这些发现强调了需要制定有针对性的沟通策略,以应对与辐射相关的认知和错误信息的复杂局面。

相似文献

1
Segmentation of the general public according to differences in knowledge and beliefs about radiation-cluster analysis by attitude, knowledge, belief and anxiety.根据公众对辐射的知识和信念差异进行分类——按态度、知识、信念和焦虑进行聚类分析
J Radiat Res. 2024 Dec 16;65(Supplement_1):i42-i51. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae030.
2
Radiation-related anxiety among public health nurses in the Fukushima Prefecture after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: a cross-sectional study.福岛第一核电站事故后福岛县公共卫生护士的辐射相关焦虑:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e013564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013564.
3
Lingering health-related anxiety about radiation among Fukushima residents as correlated with media information following the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.福岛居民因福岛第一核电站事故而对辐射相关的挥之不去的健康焦虑与媒体信息相关。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217285. eCollection 2019.
4
[Questionnaire Survey of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Workers in 2016 on Knowledge and Anxiety About Radiation].[2016年福岛第一核电站工作人员关于辐射知识与焦虑的问卷调查]
J UOEH. 2020;42(4):339-346. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.42.339.
5
The association between socioeconomic status and reactions to radiation exposure: a cross-sectional study after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident.社会经济地位与辐射暴露反应之间的关联:福岛第一核电站事故后的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205531. eCollection 2018.
6
Relationships between radiation risk perception and health anxiety, and contribution of mindfulness to alleviating psychological distress after the Fukushima accident: Cross-sectional study using a path model.辐射风险认知与健康焦虑之间的关系,以及正念对福岛事故后缓解心理困扰的作用:使用路径模型的横断面研究
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235517. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors associated with radiation risk perception among Japanese university students.日本大学生辐射风险认知的相关因素。
J Radiol Prot. 2025 Feb 3;45(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/adac6a.
8
Lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: efficient education items of radiation safety for general public.从福岛第一核电站事故中吸取的教训:面向公众的辐射安全高效教育项目。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):510-2. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv083. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
Changing Emotions About Fukushima Related to the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident-How Rumors Determined People's Attitudes: Social Media Sentiment Analysis.福岛核电厂事故引发的福岛相关情绪变化-谣言如何左右人们的态度:社交媒体情绪分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 2;22(9):e18662. doi: 10.2196/18662.
10
Trajectory and factors of radiation risk perception of students aged 10-12 years at the time of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident.福岛第一核电站事故发生时10 - 12岁学生辐射风险认知的轨迹及影响因素
J Radiol Prot. 2021 Nov 15;41(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac04b7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of the fear of medical imaging radiation scale (FOMIRS): insights from multimethod analysis.医学影像辐射恐惧量表(FOMIRS)的编制与心理测量学评估:多方法分析的见解
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 27;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02018-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The Analysis with Quantitative Indexes for Public's Awareness of Radiation Knowledge in Taiwan.台湾民众对辐射知识认知的定量指标分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013422.
2
Relationships between radiation risk perception and health anxiety, and contribution of mindfulness to alleviating psychological distress after the Fukushima accident: Cross-sectional study using a path model.辐射风险认知与健康焦虑之间的关系,以及正念对福岛事故后缓解心理困扰的作用:使用路径模型的横断面研究
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235517. eCollection 2020.
3
Lingering health-related anxiety about radiation among Fukushima residents as correlated with media information following the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.福岛居民因福岛第一核电站事故而对辐射相关的挥之不去的健康焦虑与媒体信息相关。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217285. eCollection 2019.
4
Risk Perception and Anxiety Regarding Radiation after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Systematic Qualitative Review.2011年福岛核电站事故后对辐射的风险认知与焦虑:一项系统性定性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 27;14(11):1306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111306.
5
New "loss of happy life expectancy" indicator and its use in risk comparison after Fukushima disaster.新的“幸福预期寿命损失”指标及其在福岛灾难后的风险比较中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 15;615:1527-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.132. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Mental Health Consequences and Social Issues After the Fukushima Disaster.福岛灾难后的心理健康后果及社会问题
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Mar;29(2_suppl):36S-46S. doi: 10.1177/1010539516689695.
7
From Devastation to Recovery and Revival in the Aftermath of Fukushima's Nuclear Power Plants Accident.福岛核电站事故 aftermath 后的从毁灭到恢复与复兴
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Mar;29(2_suppl):10S-17S. doi: 10.1177/1010539516675700.
8
Evaluation of Risk Perception and Risk-Comparison Information Regarding Dietary Radionuclides after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident.2011年福岛核电站事故后饮食中放射性核素的风险认知与风险比较信息评估
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0165594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165594. eCollection 2016.
9
Risk of death among children of atomic bomb survivors after 62 years of follow-up: a cohort study.追踪随访 62 年后原子弹幸存者子女的死亡风险:一项队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1316-23. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00209-0. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
An Exploratory Analysis of Public Awareness and Perception of Ionizing Radiation and Guide to Public Health Practice in Vermont.佛蒙特州公众对电离辐射的认知与看法的探索性分析及公共卫生实践指南
J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:476495. doi: 10.1155/2015/476495. Epub 2015 Apr 28.