Suppr超能文献

两种不同手术技术治疗距骨深层骨软骨损伤的前瞻性比较:镶嵌成形术与采用取自胫骨平台的支架和自体骨的全关节镜技术。

Prospective comparison of two different surgical technique in the treatment of deep osteochondral lesions of the talus: mosaicplasty versus all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond.

作者信息

Özyıldıran Mustafa, Armangil Mehmet, Özbek Emre Anıl, Akmeşe Ramazan

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sandıklı State Hospital, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 16;145(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are various surgical techniques applied for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The mosaicplasty technique is one of the most commonly used methods for deep lesions. The all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond is a novel method as an alternative to the mosaicplasty. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two different surgical techniques in the treatment of deep OLT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2019 to July 2021, 30 patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the talus were randomly divided into two groups for either mosaicplasty or the all-arthroscopic technique, and they were evaluated prospectively. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated within and between groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiological assessments were performed at 6th and 12th month postoperatively according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.

RESULTS

Mosaicplasty was applied to 15 patients, and all-arthroscopic technique was applied to 15 patients. 14 of the patients were female and 16 were male; the mean age was 38.1. Within-group evaluations revealed significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores at postoperative 6th and 12th months (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in comparison of clinical scores at any time period. There was no significant difference between the two methods according to the total MOCART scores (p > 0.05). However, the all-arthroscopic technique was more successful in terms of "border integration" and "repair tissue structure" (p < 0.05). Age, body mass index (BMI) and lesion surface area were not correlated with clinical scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of clinical and radiological scores, similar results were obtained in the treatment groups. Both surgical techniques were found to be effective in the treatment of deep OLT.

摘要

引言

有多种手术技术应用于距骨骨软骨损伤(OLT)的治疗。镶嵌成形术是治疗深层损伤最常用的方法之一。采用取自胫骨平台的支架和自体骨的全关节镜技术是一种替代镶嵌成形术的新方法。本研究旨在比较这两种不同手术技术治疗深层OLT的临床和影像学结果。

材料与方法

2019年9月至2021年7月,30例距骨深层骨软骨损伤患者被随机分为两组,分别接受镶嵌成形术或全关节镜技术治疗,并进行前瞻性评估。术前和术后在组内和组间评估美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。术后第6个月和第12个月根据软骨修复组织磁共振观察(MOCART)量表进行影像学评估。

结果

15例患者接受了镶嵌成形术,15例患者接受了全关节镜技术。患者中14例为女性,16例为男性;平均年龄为38.1岁。组内评估显示术后第6个月和第12个月AOFAS和VAS评分有显著改善(p < 0.05)。在任何时间段,治疗组之间的临床评分比较均无显著差异。根据MOCART总分,两种方法之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。然而,全关节镜技术在“边界整合”和“修复组织结构”方面更成功(p < 0.05)。年龄、体重指数(BMI)和损伤表面积与临床评分无关。

结论

在临床和影像学评分方面,治疗组获得了相似的结果。两种手术技术在治疗深层OLT方面均有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验