Fu Xueying, Smulders Fren T Y, Riecke Lars
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ear Hear. 2025;46(1):184-195. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001566. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
Identifying target sounds in challenging environments is crucial for daily experiences. It is important to note that it can be enhanced by nonauditory stimuli, for example, through lip-reading in an ongoing conversation. However, how tactile stimuli affect auditory processing is still relatively unclear. Recent studies have shown that brief tactile stimuli can reliably facilitate auditory perception, while studies using longer-lasting audio-tactile stimulation yielded conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the impact of ongoing pulsating tactile stimulation on basic auditory processing.
In experiment 1, the electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded while 24 participants performed a loudness-discrimination task on a 4-Hz modulated tone-in-noise and received either in-phase, anti-phase, or no 4-Hz electrotactile stimulation above the median nerve. In experiment 2, another 24 participants were presented with the same tactile stimulation as before, but performed a tone-in-noise detection task while their selective auditory attention was manipulated.
We found that in-phase tactile stimulation enhanced EEG responses to the tone, whereas anti-phase tactile stimulation suppressed these responses. No corresponding tactile effects on loudness-discrimination performance were observed in experiment 1. Using a yes/no paradigm in experiment 2, we found that in-phase tactile stimulation, but not anti-phase tactile stimulation, improved detection thresholds. Selective attention also improved thresholds but did not modulate the observed benefit from in-phase tactile stimulation.
Our study highlights that ongoing in-phase tactile input can enhance basic auditory processing as reflected in scalp EEG and detection thresholds. This might have implications for the development of hearing enhancement technologies and interventions.
在具有挑战性的环境中识别目标声音对日常体验至关重要。需要注意的是,这可以通过非听觉刺激来增强,例如在正在进行的对话中通过唇读。然而,触觉刺激如何影响听觉处理仍相对不清楚。最近的研究表明,短暂的触觉刺激可以可靠地促进听觉感知,而使用持续时间更长的听觉 - 触觉刺激的研究则产生了相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在调查持续的脉动触觉刺激对基本听觉处理的影响。
在实验1中,记录了24名参与者在对4赫兹调制的噪声中的音调执行响度辨别任务时的脑电图(EEG),并在正中神经上方给予同相、反相或无4赫兹电触觉刺激。在实验2中,另外24名参与者接受了与之前相同的触觉刺激,但在操纵他们的选择性听觉注意力时执行了噪声中的音调检测任务。
我们发现同相触觉刺激增强了脑电图对音调的反应,而反相触觉刺激则抑制了这些反应。在实验1中未观察到对响度辨别性能的相应触觉影响。在实验2中使用是/否范式,我们发现同相触觉刺激而非反相触觉刺激改善了检测阈值。选择性注意力也改善了阈值,但并未调节观察到的同相触觉刺激带来的益处。
我们的研究强调,持续的同相触觉输入可以增强基本听觉处理,这在头皮脑电图和检测阈值中得到体现。这可能对听力增强技术和干预措施的发展具有启示意义。